This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Feb 14th, Templates Minutes"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
MulrooneyG (talk | contribs) |
MulrooneyG (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
3/0/0 | 3/0/0 | ||
| − | Regarding ballot line number 2, GG motioned that we accept as Persuasive with Mod, with the following rationale: "The problem here is that "interoperability contract" was a badly chosen term. As agreed in committee, I have changed it to "interoperability Paradigm" and beefed up the clarification to clarify why paradigms matter in the template specification" | + | Regarding ballot line number 2, GG motioned that we accept as Persuasive with Mod, with the following rationale: "The problem here is that "interoperability contract" was a badly chosen term. As agreed in committee, I have changed it to "interoperability Paradigm" and beefed up the clarification to clarify why paradigms matter in the template specification" MS seconded. 3/0/0 |
Revision as of 21:40, 14 February 2007
GG distributed an updated version of the templates spec
GG motioned that we accept the changes to section 1.4 as written in response to various comments. MS seconded. 3/0/0
Regarding ballot line number 2, GG motioned that we accept as Persuasive with Mod, with the following rationale: "The problem here is that "interoperability contract" was a badly chosen term. As agreed in committee, I have changed it to "interoperability Paradigm" and beefed up the clarification to clarify why paradigms matter in the template specification" MS seconded. 3/0/0
