This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 15 December 2015"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:
 
* This suggestion was sent to the patient care list.
 
* This suggestion was sent to the patient care list.
 
* In general readers felt, that a problem concern and consequently also the problem list were the tools with which care providers would work, while health concern and a concern list would be the topic under which patient concerns would reside.  
 
* In general readers felt, that a problem concern and consequently also the problem list were the tools with which care providers would work, while health concern and a concern list would be the topic under which patient concerns would reside.  
−
 
+
* The first part of this statement might be true, but health concern are not the exclusive ownership of patients for patient's concern. Any person including care providers could  make use of health concerns. Problem concerns could be a subset of a health concern, that would have a longer span and could connect evolving problem concerns together. 
 
* The chapters 4, 5 and 6 were thoroughly revised and shortened.
 
* The chapters 4, 5 and 6 were thoroughly revised and shortened.
−
* Goals are part of the Care Plan scope. That is why you will not find it in the Health Concern DAM. In the diagram they are depicted in the black box of Care plan.
+
* * MU3 does need rules of how to build your sections and subsections and how to use the templates. These are guidelines for implementation, that will set restrictions to the nesting and grouping of health concerns and problem concerns.
−
* The following actions are still outstanding:
 
−
** Review the use case scenario's:
 
−
*** Remove redundant scenario's
 
−
*** Patient journey scenario should reflect the patient's  perspective.
 
−
*** Better example of a storyboard with the patient's concern.
 
−
** Update the comparison in the appendix between (newer versions of ) DAM, CCDA and Contsys.
 
−
* Dan is anxious to know how health concerns will work from the patient's perspective.
 
−
* There are different roles attached to a health concern. The DAM does not make a distinction in the background of the author. This could be a patient or relatives of the patient ( example of anorexia case).
 
−
* The DAM itself is agnostic of systems. Currently most enviroments can only deal with concerns within one system.
 
−
* A list is a presentation ( or appearance) of grouped information. Problem lists or allergy lists are some (of the most common examples)  of output. It is not the problem concern or health concern itself.
 
−
* The structure of a problem concern is identical to the health concern. A health concern could be nested and have subconcerns. That is the reason why you do not see the problem concern as a seperate data element in the diagram.
 
−
* MU3 does need rules of how to build your sections and subsections and how to use the templates. These are guidelines for implementation, that will set restrictions to the nesting and grouping of health concerns and problem concerns.
 
 
* PCWG will remain responsible for the functional requirements of Health Concern. SDWG will focus on the technical requirements of Health Concern in structured docs.
 
* PCWG will remain responsible for the functional requirements of Health Concern. SDWG will focus on the technical requirements of Health Concern in structured docs.
  

Revision as of 13:10, 16 December 2015

Health Concern Topic

Patient Care WG

December 15 2015

Attendees:

  • Michael Tan – Chair
  • David Pyke
  • David Tao
  • Jay Lyle
  • Emma Jones
  • Dan Russler
  • Darell Woelk
  • Laura Heermann Langford


Participation Information Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 Participant Passcode: 943377

Web Meeting Info www.webex.com Meeting number 249 522 346

Minutes previous meeting

  • There were no comments about the minutes of the previous meeting.
  • Motion to approve: David, second: Jay. Vote: 7 in favor, 0 abstain, 0 against.

Topics

  • Jay has written a suggestion to explain the difference between a problem concern and a health concern.
  • This suggestion was sent to the patient care list.
  • In general readers felt, that a problem concern and consequently also the problem list were the tools with which care providers would work, while health concern and a concern list would be the topic under which patient concerns would reside.
  • The first part of this statement might be true, but health concern are not the exclusive ownership of patients for patient's concern. Any person including care providers could make use of health concerns. Problem concerns could be a subset of a health concern, that would have a longer span and could connect evolving problem concerns together.
  • The chapters 4, 5 and 6 were thoroughly revised and shortened.
  • * MU3 does need rules of how to build your sections and subsections and how to use the templates. These are guidelines for implementation, that will set restrictions to the nesting and grouping of health concerns and problem concerns.
  • PCWG will remain responsible for the functional requirements of Health Concern. SDWG will focus on the technical requirements of Health Concern in structured docs.


The document can be found here: File:Current DAM.docx

Action items

  • Jay will function as a liaison between PCWG and SDWG for harmonization of Health Concerns between these groups.


Go back to health concern minutes[[1]]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=Conference_call_minutes_15_December_2015&oldid=110085"