|
|
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=HL7_FHIR_Provenance_Resource HL7 FHIR Provenance Resource] | | [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=HL7_FHIR_Provenance_Resource HL7 FHIR Provenance Resource] |
| | | | |
| − | ==W3C== | + | ==[[W3C PROV Use Cases and Requirements]]== |
| − | =[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=HL7_FHIR_Provenance_Resource Provenance Dimensions]= | |
| − | | |
| − | This is a list of important dimensions in provenance that the group identified in order to guide the collection of use cases. We have grouped these dimensions into three major categories: the content of provenance information, the management of provenance as it exists on the web, and the use of provenance.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Note: These dimensions are not mutually exclusive. A use case may include more than one dimension. It is helpful in a use case to identify the primary dimension that the use case is trying to illustrate and then list other secondary dimensions.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The group is currently soliciting comments for these dimensions. Please put comments and suggestions in the [http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/wiki/Talk:Provenance_Dimensions discussion section].
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Content'''
| |
| − | *Object - what the provenance is about
| |
| − | * Attribution - provenance as the sources or entities that were used to create a new result
| |
| − | **Responsibility - knowing who endorses a particular piece of information or result
| |
| − | **Origin - recorded vs reconstructed, verified vs non-verified (eg with digital signatures), asserted vs inferred
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Process - provenance as the process that yielded an artifact ## Reproducibility (eg workflows, mashups, text extraction)
| |
| − | *Data Access (e.g. access time, accessed server, party responsible for accessed server)
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Evolution and versioning ## Republishing (e.g. retweeting, reblogging, republishing)
| |
| − | * Updates (eg a document that assembles content from various sources and that changes over time)
| |
| − | | |
| − | * Justification for Decisions - capturing why and how a particular decision is made ## argumentation - what was considered and debated (eg pros and cons) before reaching a solution
| |
| − | * hypothesis management (eg in HLCS scientific discourse task when complementary/contrary evidence is provided by different sources)
| |
| − | * why-not questions - capturing why a particular choice was not made
| |
| − | *Entailment - given the results to a particular query in a reasoning system or DB, capture how the system produced an answer given what axioms or tuples it contained that led to those results
| |
| − | | |
| − | '''Management'''
| |
| − | *Publication - Making provenance information available on the web (how do you expose it, how do you distribute it)
| |
| − | *Access - Finding and querying provenance information
| |
| − | **Finding the provenance information, perhaps through an authoritative service
| |
| − | **Query formulation and execution mechanisms
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Dissemination control - Using provenance to track the policies for when/how an entity can be used as specified by the creator of that entity ## Access Control - incorporate access control policies to access provenance information
| |
| − | *Licensing - stating what rights the object creators and users have based on provenance
| |
| − | *Law enforcement (eg enforcing privacy policies on the use of personal information)
| |
| − | *Scale - how to operate with large amounts of provenance information
| |
| − | '''
| |
| − | Use''' | |
| − | *Understanding - End user consumption of provenance.
| |
| − | **abstraction, multiple levels of description, summary
| |
| − | **presentation, visualization
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Interoperability - combining provenance produced by multiple different systems
| |
| − | *Comparison - finding what's in common in the provenance of two or more entities (eg two experimental results)
| |
| − | *Accountability - the ability to check the provenance of an object with respect to some expectation
| |
| − | **Verification - of a set of requirements
| |
| − | **Compliance - with a set of policies
| |
| − | | |
| − | *Trust - making trust judgements based on provenance
| |
| − | **Information quality - choosing among competing evidence from diverse sources (eg linked data use cases)
| |
| − | **Incorporating reputation and reliability ratings with attribution information
| |
| − | *Imperfections - reasoning about provenance information that is not complete or correct **Incomplete provenance
| |
| − | **Uncertain/probabilistic provenance
| |
| − | **Erroneous provenance
| |
| − | **Fraudulent provenance
| |
| − | | |
| − | 8Debugging
| |
