This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "September 22, 2015 CBCC Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 71: Line 71:
 
|-
 
|-
 
||.||  [mailto:pf@peterfiaspa.com Peter Fiaspa], Colombia University
 
||.||  [mailto:pf@peterfiaspa.com Peter Fiaspa], Colombia University
−
||||| [mailto: Gary Dickenson  ]     
+
|||x|| [mailto: Gary Dickenson  ]     
−
|||||| [mailto: McDowell ]
+
||||x|| [mailto:russell.mcdonell@c-cost.com Russell McDonell ]
 
|-
 
|-
 
|}
 
|}
Line 98: Line 98:
 
The minutes from the September 15
 
The minutes from the September 15
 
1 Abstain (McDowell); Objections: None, Pass: 8
 
1 Abstain (McDowell); Objections: None, Pass: 8
 +
 +
 +
 +
Data Provenance:
 +
Request for publication approval at the WGM for Data Provenance as DSTU
 +
HL7
 +
 +
Data Provenance Metadata Relations
 +
* contains provenance metadata; have the open to link the metadata to any data (clinical statement, document, etc) the parent document information in the header of the CDA can also link to the Reference Choice; and relay that one or more document is related to one or more documents.
 +
* author of provenance data can also be identified
 +
* more robust accounting of documents
 +
* provenance performer
 +
** what causes the province ...(what entitiy) causes the provenance to happen
 +
**
 +
* provannce label
 +
** part of the HCS, labels related toprovancne
 +
** i.e. data alteration, level of confidence, supported by/asserted by.  set of labels specific to provenance as found in the HCS
 +
* give you the ability tosay, the preceeding artifact was 'fine', but because this is a CDA, you broke the signature--this gives you the opportunity to say that you received the artifact, 'its fine';
 +
* provenance policy information file
 +
** specificies your province policy that you have agreed to abide by
 +
 +
What is the minimum amount of dta required to complete the provenance data?  300 bytes of data? 500 bytes
 +
Its not so much the size of the data, rather the ability to retrieve, propulate and read it... the more data, the more complex it will be, and most likely domain specific.  Even though an item may say SHALL, they may not have that information (i.e. we only require that the author be identified)
 +
This may become an issue when a CDA has been accumulated over a number of times
 +
* if this CDA were to go to someone else, they would not be keeping th eprovannce data--they would be starting their own provannce.
 +
 +
Please review the "Provance data added to the balloted document" Kathleen will be sending the information out to the CBCC list serve, please contact Suzanne if you would like to receive the information and are not yet part of the list serve.
 +
Kathleen will have the information out for review
 +
 +
 +
 +
working on
 +
 +
PASS Access - ballot comments are due September 28, please review and comment!
 +
 +
Joint EHR, Security Privacy Vocabulary Alignment
 +
* coming ot concensus with th eprocess,
 +
* group has agreed to meet at the WGM on Wed Q3, Thurs Q3 in Atlanta to do some face-to-face work

Revision as of 18:39, 22 September 2015

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Back to CBCC Main Page

Meeting Information

Attendees

Member Name x Member Name x Member Name
. Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair x Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair x Jim Kretz CBCC Co-Chair
. Max Walker CBCC Co-Chair x Mike Davis Security Co-Chair John Moehrke Security Co-Chair
x Kathleen Connor . Ken Salyards CBCC Interim Co-Chair Lori Simon CBCC Interim Co-Chair
x Diana Proud-Madruga x Rick Grow Harry Rhodes
. Serafina Versaggi Ioana Singureanu David Bergman
x Steve Eichner . Steve Daviss . Wende Baker
. Reed Gelzer . Marlowe Greenberg Chris Clark, WV
. Paul Knapp . Matt Peeling Brian Newton
Lisa Nelson . Mike Lardiere . Amanda Nash
. Mohammed Jafari Oliver Lawless Keith Boone
x Neelima Chennamaraja Susan Litton Sandra Huyck
. William Kinsley . Debbie Bucci Chirag Bhatt
. Linda Bailey-Woods x Lee Wise Lori McNeil Tolley
. Peter Fiaspa, Colombia University x [mailto: Gary Dickenson ] x Russell McDonell


Back to CBCC Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Meeting Minutes from September 15, 2015 CBCC Conference Call
  2. (05 min) Patient Friendly Language for Consumer User Interfaces - (Standing Agenda Item) - Update
  3. (05 min) Data Provenance IG Update (Standing Agenda item)
  4. Behavioral Health Domain Analysis Model (HL7 BH DAM) Update update
    • Unique Ballot ID: V3_DAM_BH_R2_I1_2015SEP, HL7 Version 3 Domain Analysis Model: Behavioral Health Record, Release 2 (Project Insight ID: 1174)
  5. (10 min) PASS Access Control Services Conceptual Model - (Standing agenda item) update (Diana)
  6. (10 min) Joint EHR, Security, Privacy Vocabulary Alignment - (Standing agenda item) update (Diana/Mike)
    • continued work at WGM WED Q3, THU Q3
  7. (10 min) Action Item Review (if any)

Meeting Minutes (DRAFT)

Approve Meeting Minutes from September 15, 2015 CBCC Conference Call

The minutes from the September 15 1 Abstain (McDowell); Objections: None, Pass: 8


Data Provenance: Request for publication approval at the WGM for Data Provenance as DSTU HL7

Data Provenance Metadata Relations

  • contains provenance metadata; have the open to link the metadata to any data (clinical statement, document, etc) the parent document information in the header of the CDA can also link to the Reference Choice; and relay that one or more document is related to one or more documents.
  • author of provenance data can also be identified
  • more robust accounting of documents
  • provenance performer
    • what causes the province ...(what entitiy) causes the provenance to happen
  • provannce label
    • part of the HCS, labels related toprovancne
    • i.e. data alteration, level of confidence, supported by/asserted by. set of labels specific to provenance as found in the HCS
  • give you the ability tosay, the preceeding artifact was 'fine', but because this is a CDA, you broke the signature--this gives you the opportunity to say that you received the artifact, 'its fine';
  • provenance policy information file
    • specificies your province policy that you have agreed to abide by

What is the minimum amount of dta required to complete the provenance data? 300 bytes of data? 500 bytes Its not so much the size of the data, rather the ability to retrieve, propulate and read it... the more data, the more complex it will be, and most likely domain specific. Even though an item may say SHALL, they may not have that information (i.e. we only require that the author be identified) This may become an issue when a CDA has been accumulated over a number of times

  • if this CDA were to go to someone else, they would not be keeping th eprovannce data--they would be starting their own provannce.

Please review the "Provance data added to the balloted document" Kathleen will be sending the information out to the CBCC list serve, please contact Suzanne if you would like to receive the information and are not yet part of the list serve. Kathleen will have the information out for review


working on

PASS Access - ballot comments are due September 28, please review and comment!

Joint EHR, Security Privacy Vocabulary Alignment

  • coming ot concensus with th eprocess,
  • group has agreed to meet at the WGM on Wed Q3, Thurs Q3 in Atlanta to do some face-to-face work
Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=September_22,_2015_CBCC_Conference_Call&oldid=104518"