This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 3 July 2015"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 25: Line 25:
 
*These tables have the purpose to show how it would look without the concept of concerns.
 
*These tables have the purpose to show how it would look without the concept of concerns.
 
*The tables were reinstated in the DAM.
 
*The tables were reinstated in the DAM.
*We discussed the issue of concerns pointing to health care events of other patients. The use case of a transplantation was brought up. How do we deal with the observations of the donor patient? Michael will write a use case scenario of a kidney transplant and ask Larry and Stephen how this should be captured in a system. It is not clear if the current model can capture this requirement. An HC event does have an intricate relationship to a patient.
+
*We discussed the issue of concerns pointing to health care events of other patients. The use case of a transplantation was brought up. How do we deal with the observations of the donor patient? Michael will write a use case scenario of a kidney transplant and ask Larry and Stephen how this should be captured in a system. It is not clear if the current model can capture this requirement. An HC event always has a relationship to a patient.
  
 
==Any Other Business==
 
==Any Other Business==

Latest revision as of 06:10, 3 July 2015

Health Concern Topic

Patient Care WG

July 3 2015

Attendees:

  • Michael Tan – Chair
  • David Pyke
  • Jay Lyle

Participation Information Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 Participant Passcode: 943377

Web Meeting Info www.webex.com Meeting number 230 634 425

Topics

  • Discussed a forgotten ballot comment from Kathleen Connor about security and privacy issues.
  • The DAM model does contain attribute confidentiality in Health Concern and Health Concern event.
  • The comment was found persuasive with mod. The clarification of confidentiality is adjusted to comply to the comment.
  • We discussed the removal of the tables in the scenario op chapter 7 of the DAM.
  • These tables have the purpose to show how it would look without the concept of concerns.
  • The tables were reinstated in the DAM.
  • We discussed the issue of concerns pointing to health care events of other patients. The use case of a transplantation was brought up. How do we deal with the observations of the donor patient? Michael will write a use case scenario of a kidney transplant and ask Larry and Stephen how this should be captured in a system. It is not clear if the current model can capture this requirement. An HC event always has a relationship to a patient.

Any Other Business

  • Looking at the diagram we wondered if the person now currently attached to health concern event, should be attached to health concern itself.
  • Next weeks call is the last call before Michael's holiday.

Action items

  • Review and adjust DAM document with Jay ( action David)
  • Set up use case scenario for organ transplantation. ( action Jay)


Go back to health concern minutes: [[1]]