Difference between revisions of "RDF for Semantic Interoperability"
| Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
Comparison of FHIR to RDF element mappings | Comparison of FHIR to RDF element mappings | ||
| − | [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/ | + | [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/2/20/FHIR_RDF_Sample_side_by_side_comparisons.pdf [Side by side documentation of approaches] |
'''Next Steps''' | '''Next Steps''' | ||
Revision as of 23:44, 20 April 2015
- Return to ITS Main Page | ITS RDF Minutes 2014 | All ITS RDF Pages | ITS Email Archives | W3C HCLS Email Archives | Issues List
The RDF for Semantic Interoperability group (or RDF group) is a sub-group of the HL7 ITS work group and a joint collaboration with the W3C Healthcare and Life Sciences group on Clinical Observations Interoperability to facilitate the use of RDF as a common semantic foundation for healthcare information interoperability.
Contents
- 1 How to Participate
- 2 Work Projects
How to Participate
Anyone may join this group simply by participating in the work, which is conducted mainly on the public HL7 and W3C mailing lists listed below and on a weekly teleconference. You are encouraged to become an HL7 member, but not required unless you wish to take a leadership role in an HL7 group, such as becoming a co-chair. You are also encouraged to have your organization become a W3C member, but not required. See benefits of W3C membership.
Mailing lists (please cross post to both):
Weekly Teleconference
Work Projects
FHIR ontology
Champions: Claude Nanjo, Tony Mallia, Eric Prud'hommeaux, Marc Twagirumukiza, Hans Cools
- FHIR Ontology Requirements
- FHIR Examples For Driving FHIR Ontology Development
- Use JSON-LD?
- Reviews of four FHIR ontology approaches:
- FHIR RDF Mapping - Potential Strategies
Next Steps
- Converge on unified FHIR ontology approach
ICD-11 and SNOMED
Champions: Tony Mallia, Daniel Karlsson, Hans Cools
- ACTION: Tony to find out more details about how iCat handles ICD-11 ont and report back [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action01]
- Discussion
Next Steps
- @@ TODO @@
Use Cases
Champions: Guoqian Jiang, others? COI Use cases on W3C wiki
- ACTION: Guoqian to figure out whether he can share URI conventions for ICD-11 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/25-hcls-minutes.html#action07]
- Discussion
Goals of use cases:
- Drive and unify diverse efforts, e.g., FHIR ontology
Kinds of use cases desired:
- Simple enough for use in slide presentations
- Realistic enough to be convincing
Use case ideas:
- Migration of CCDA to FHIR (EricP)
- Utility on FHIR RDF that would motivate mapping of FHIR XML to FHIR RDF (EricP)
Next Steps
- EricP will present C-CDA example on Dec 23.
- Waiting for Guoqian for broader discussion of use cases.
PhUSE-FDA project (formerly CDISC2RDF)
Champions: Kerstin_Forsberg, Ingeborg, Tim Williams, (and Charlie Mead?)
- ACTION: Kerstin and Ingeborg to prepare a status and future state ideas for PhUSE-FDA work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action05]
- Discussion
Next Steps
- DBooth scheduled @@@@ to discuss PhUSE-FDA project on Jan 6 teleconference.
C-CDA RDF representations
Champions: Eric Prud'hommeaux, Joshua Phillips
- ACTION: Eric to establish/make a wiki page for C-CDA RDF representations work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action06]
- ACTION: Eric and Joshua to report on C-CDA RDF representations work plan [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2014/11/18-hcls-minutes.html#action07] -- PENDING? (On Dec 16 call I thought Eric said this was done pending review, but I cannot seem to find it.)
- Discussion
Next Steps
- EricP will present C-CDA example on Dec 23.
- @@ TODO @@
Standard URI Representations
- File:URI.pdf - Outline of URI approach presented to HL7 ~2012
High-level concept mapping to RDF (AR typeCodes, etc.)
Champions: Tony Mallia, Rob Hausam
Comparison of FHIR to RDF element mappings [Side by side documentation of approaches
Next Steps
- @@ TODO @@
Common model for data element management and value set binding
Group Discussion on February 17, 2015
- Scope of the project
- ISO 11179 - Metadata Registry Standard
- CIMI - Clinical Information Modeling
- CTS2 Value Sets Management
- Data Validation and Transformation task force
- OWL reasoning
- ShEX
- Use Cases
- CDISC
- CIMI
- PhEMA - EHR-Driven Phenotype Algorithm Authoring and Execution
- NQF Quality Data Model (QDM)
- HL7 FHIR Model Element
- Related Links
- EU project SALUS uses ISO11179 - SemamticMDR http://www.srdc.com.tr/projects/salus/blog/?p=181
- Enterprise Vocabulary Services: http://evs.nci.nih.gov/
- An earlier project between AstraZeneca and IBM to build a ISO11179 based "Clinical Reference Library" http://www.slideshare.net/kerfors/designing-and-launching-the-clinical-reference-library
Group Discussion on February 10, 2015
- http://www.w3.org/2015/Talks/0203-11179-egp/
- Guoqian Jaing and Eric Prud'hommeaux also discussed work at Mayo on a common model for data element management and value set binding, leveraging ISO 11179
- Eric also asked who else would be interested in a data Validation and Transformation task force, and three people indicated interest (Ingeborg, Alejandra, Kerstin_Forsberg).
- http://www.w3.org/2015/02/10-hcls-minutes.html
