This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "OO CR172-832 OBX Grouping"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:
  
 
== Resolution ==
 
== Resolution ==
From notes 10/16/2014:
+
From notes 10/16/2014:See document for changes - Motion to accept as updated.  Jose Costa Teixeira, Mark Jones
 +
Discussion:
 +
• What are the choices for datatypes for codes:
 +
o IS, ID, CWE, CNE
 +
• Kathy prefers to just be able to send the code,
 +
• Freida sees the note about needign to be CWE only on IS, but not ID,
 +
• Consider changing datatype for OBX-30 from CWE to ID, which will also leave control of this in HL7 hands.  Updated the proposal to ID for OBX-30.
 +
VOTE: Against: 0 ; Abstain: 2; In Favor: 13
 +
Moved to InM since the datatype is part of their chapter. OO will add OBX-30.

Revision as of 20:15, 29 October 2014

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Hans Buitendijk Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: October 15, 2014 Change request ID: 172-832
Standard/IG: Standard Artifact ID, Name:

Issue

Recommendation

See OBX Grouping for proposed approach.

Rationale

Justification

Discussion

Recommended Action Items

Resolution

From notes 10/16/2014:See document for changes - Motion to accept as updated. Jose Costa Teixeira, Mark Jones Discussion: • What are the choices for datatypes for codes: o IS, ID, CWE, CNE • Kathy prefers to just be able to send the code, • Freida sees the note about needign to be CWE only on IS, but not ID, • Consider changing datatype for OBX-30 from CWE to ID, which will also leave control of this in HL7 hands. Updated the proposal to ID for OBX-30. VOTE: Against: 0 ; Abstain: 2; In Favor: 13 Moved to InM since the datatype is part of their chapter. OO will add OBX-30.