This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 26 June 2014"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Michael tan (talk | contribs) |
Michael tan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Discussion on DAM Material== | ==Discussion on DAM Material== | ||
| − | + | Link to DAM Document: | |
| − | + | Link to Models [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Health_Concern_Cases_and_Scenarios] | |
| − | + | #Group began review of the DAM document | |
| − | + | #Content is complete but document needs some editing | |
| − | + | #Michael will edit the document and then send to Stephen for additional editing. | |
| − | + | #Inclusion of C-CDA comments discussed. Elaine will set up a comparison table. | |
| − | + | #To sync use cases and scenarios Jay will review the DAM document. | |
| − | + | #Health concern is a class so it will have a definition in the model – so, may not need persistence unless helpful for harmonization purposes with C-CDA. May include some harmonization suggestions for SDWG in an appendix. The DAM should show how we want to use data from the health concern in the work flow. This is really a storyboard approach for using these data. | |
| − | + | #What about the work that had been done in V3 – in 2009. Is the DAM based on the original ballot or de novo work? The purpose of the DAM is to clearly explain concepts. Anticipate several ballot cycles. | |
| − | + | #Make sure that the ballot for September is an informative ballot. | |
| − | + | ##Review of the class diagram: | |
| − | + | ##Discuss relationship of intervention and risk to the observation. | |
| − | + | ##Added risk to the class diagram. | |
==Actions== | ==Actions== | ||
Revision as of 07:37, 27 June 2014
Contents
Health Concern Topic
Patient Care WG
June 26, 2014
Attendees
- Michael Tan – Chair
- Elaine Ayres – Scribe
- Stephen Chu
- Sharon Solomon
- Jay Lyle
- Becky Angeles
- Julia Chan
Minutes:
Postponed: not enough quorum at the start of call.
Discussion on DAM Material
Link to DAM Document: Link to Models [1]
- Group began review of the DAM document
- Content is complete but document needs some editing
- Michael will edit the document and then send to Stephen for additional editing.
- Inclusion of C-CDA comments discussed. Elaine will set up a comparison table.
- To sync use cases and scenarios Jay will review the DAM document.
- Health concern is a class so it will have a definition in the model – so, may not need persistence unless helpful for harmonization purposes with C-CDA. May include some harmonization suggestions for SDWG in an appendix. The DAM should show how we want to use data from the health concern in the work flow. This is really a storyboard approach for using these data.
- What about the work that had been done in V3 – in 2009. Is the DAM based on the original ballot or de novo work? The purpose of the DAM is to clearly explain concepts. Anticipate several ballot cycles.
- Make sure that the ballot for September is an informative ballot.
- Review of the class diagram:
- Discuss relationship of intervention and risk to the observation.
- Added risk to the class diagram.
Actions
- Michael will update the DAM document
- Jay will republish the class diagram and the logical model.
- Next meeting -- July 3, 2014
