Difference between revisions of "OO CR124-SPM Clarification"
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{OO Accepted LRI IG Change Requests}} Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 border=1 || '''Submitted by:'...") |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) (→Issue) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Issue == | == Issue == | ||
| − | It is not clear when to include an SPM segment in the LRI message. See challenges described in [[ | + | It is not clear when to include an SPM segment in the LRI message. See challenges described in [[Image:OO CR124.doc]] |
== Recommendation == | == Recommendation == | ||
Latest revision as of 23:52, 12 February 2013
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Rob Snelick | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: February 12, 2013 | Change request ID: OO CR124 |
| Standard/IG: LRI IG | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
It is not clear when to include an SPM segment in the LRI message. See challenges described in File:OO CR124.doc
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
12-Feb-2013 - Motion to clarify that the child never inherits the specimen information from the parent. Therefore, if the child’s test used a specimen, it must be reported with the child’s OBR. Do not change the RE to R on the Specimen Group.
“When reporting child results, the specimen information reported on its parent is not inherited by the children. Each child OBR should include the specimen segment(s) for the observation it reports.”
Bob Dieterle, Les Keepper Include as an errata update, does not need to wait for next version. Against: 0; Abstain: 3; In Favor: 6
Recommend as errata to the LRI IG
