Difference between revisions of "September 2012 WGM Baltimore"
Hugh leslie (talk | contribs) |
Michael tan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
=== PC Tuesday Q1 === | === PC Tuesday Q1 === | ||
Present: | Present: | ||
| + | The topic of this quarter is the ballot reconciliation. The good news is that the DMIM now has reached the normative status. One negative comment has been submitted, but no comment was sent in. Therefore the negative vote had to be ignored. | ||
| + | A motion has been put to remove DerivationExpr from the walkthrough. | ||
| + | There are 9 entry points of which 3 are not mentioned to the Clinical Statement. Decision to add the 3 entry points to the text of the walkthrough. | ||
| + | The text from the “ServiceDeliverylocation” will be removed. | ||
| + | Jean has to add “status-code”to the act of Transportation . | ||
| + | The 3 variants of “source of” has to be explained. William to add the text. And the Pertinent2 text has to be removed.. | ||
| + | The numbers of the act relationship has to be adjusted. | ||
| + | The text about authorization has to adjusted. | ||
| + | On the missing diagram, remove the link to the graphic nr.31. | ||
| + | A picture from Isobel Frean’s document has been copied and used as storyboard diagram 33. | ||
| + | Decision to let William and Michael to find the pictures or create them once more. | ||
| + | Please look at the remarks on the ballot reconciliation spreadsheet. | ||
| + | A motion was put forward to accept the comments and the dispositions. The motion was put forward by Irma Jongeneel, seconded by Jean Duteau. 0 against, 0 abstain and 11 in favor. | ||
| + | Suggestion to add wording to the ballot material to explain that the standard is co-owned by the patient administration. The DMIM will only be changed in joint meetings with PA and PC. | ||
| + | Motion forwarded to make this a formal decision. 0 against, 0 abstain, and 12 in favor. | ||
| + | Add text to explain that the RMIM’s are explained in the separate sections of patient care and patient admin. Also explain in the visio of the DMIM. | ||
| + | The negatives votes from Gunther Shadow and Keith Boone have to be withdrawn before the | ||
| + | material can be submitted for normative publication. William will approach Keith and Gunther. Action Item WGo. | ||
| + | If they do not withdraw their negative votes the PC will follow the normal procedure to vote. This motion has been accepted: 0 against, 0 abstain and 12 in favor. | ||
| + | The visio and the text of the Care Record Query were not in line. Michael had added extra parameters to the query on request of Patient Administration (such as the location of the encounter). However Irma could not remember this request. Therefore the extra parameters will be removed. | ||
| + | William questions whether the care record query should really also be a joint topic between PA and PC, rather than a specific query for PA. A new project scope should be submitted to discuss this subject. A motion was put forward to withdraw the extra parameters from the Care Record Query and to discuss the addition of these parameters in a new project for a future version. The motion was accepted: 0 against, 0 abstain and 12 in favor. | ||
| + | |||
=== PC Tuesday Q2 === | === PC Tuesday Q2 === | ||
Present: | Present: | ||
Revision as of 15:27, 11 September 2012
PC Baltimore WGM 2012 September
Contents
PC Monday Sep 10 2012
Plenary
PC Monday Q3
Present: Michael Tan, Stephen Chu, Kevin Coonan, William Goosen, Hugh Leslie, Jon Farmer, Chris White, Isebella Gibaud, Adel Ghlamallah
Motion to accept the minutes of the May WGM - Vancouver: Moved Stephen, Second Hugh, 1 abstain, 0 against, 6 for - passed.
Planning for the rest of the week
September Ballot - Quorum was met and all four were complete with only one neg which was withdrawn.
Patient Care Work Plan Review: Review 3 year work plan. Discussion about V2 materials and need for continued development of the V2 messages. Lots of V2 messaging is still ongoing.
Motion: To accept the changes to the work plan (see published spreadsheet). Stephen Moved, Chris White Second - 0 against, 0 abstain, 8 in favour.
PC Monday Q4
O&O - see O&O minutes
PC Tuesday Sep 11 2012
PC Tuesday Q1
Present: The topic of this quarter is the ballot reconciliation. The good news is that the DMIM now has reached the normative status. One negative comment has been submitted, but no comment was sent in. Therefore the negative vote had to be ignored. A motion has been put to remove DerivationExpr from the walkthrough. There are 9 entry points of which 3 are not mentioned to the Clinical Statement. Decision to add the 3 entry points to the text of the walkthrough. The text from the “ServiceDeliverylocation” will be removed. Jean has to add “status-code”to the act of Transportation . The 3 variants of “source of” has to be explained. William to add the text. And the Pertinent2 text has to be removed.. The numbers of the act relationship has to be adjusted. The text about authorization has to adjusted. On the missing diagram, remove the link to the graphic nr.31. A picture from Isobel Frean’s document has been copied and used as storyboard diagram 33. Decision to let William and Michael to find the pictures or create them once more. Please look at the remarks on the ballot reconciliation spreadsheet. A motion was put forward to accept the comments and the dispositions. The motion was put forward by Irma Jongeneel, seconded by Jean Duteau. 0 against, 0 abstain and 11 in favor. Suggestion to add wording to the ballot material to explain that the standard is co-owned by the patient administration. The DMIM will only be changed in joint meetings with PA and PC. Motion forwarded to make this a formal decision. 0 against, 0 abstain, and 12 in favor. Add text to explain that the RMIM’s are explained in the separate sections of patient care and patient admin. Also explain in the visio of the DMIM. The negatives votes from Gunther Shadow and Keith Boone have to be withdrawn before the material can be submitted for normative publication. William will approach Keith and Gunther. Action Item WGo. If they do not withdraw their negative votes the PC will follow the normal procedure to vote. This motion has been accepted: 0 against, 0 abstain and 12 in favor. The visio and the text of the Care Record Query were not in line. Michael had added extra parameters to the query on request of Patient Administration (such as the location of the encounter). However Irma could not remember this request. Therefore the extra parameters will be removed. William questions whether the care record query should really also be a joint topic between PA and PC, rather than a specific query for PA. A new project scope should be submitted to discuss this subject. A motion was put forward to withdraw the extra parameters from the Care Record Query and to discuss the addition of these parameters in a new project for a future version. The motion was accepted: 0 against, 0 abstain and 12 in favor.
PC Tuesday Q2
Present:
PC Tuesday Q3
Present:
PC Tuesday Q4
Present:
PC Wednesday Sep 12 2012
PC Wednesday Q1
Present:
PC Wednesday Q2
Present:
PC Wednesday Q3
Present:
PC Wednesday Q4
Present:
PC Thursday Sep 13 2012
PC Wednesday Q1
Present:
PC Thursday Q2
Present:
PC Thursday Q3
Present:
PC Thursday Q4
Present:
