This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "OO CR080 - TimeStamps"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "{{OO Open Change Requests}} {{OO Open LRI IG Change Requests}} Return to OO Change Requests page. {|width=100% cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2 borde...")
 
Line 10: Line 10:
 
|| '''Change request ID:''' OO CR080
 
|| '''Change request ID:''' OO CR080
 
|-
 
|-
|| '''Standard/IG:''' Standard
+
|| '''Standard/IG:''' Implementation Guide
 
|| '''Artifact ID, Name: ''' <<Artifact ID, Name>>
 
|| '''Artifact ID, Name: ''' <<Artifact ID, Name>>
 
|-
 
|-
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
== Issue ==
 
== Issue ==
TS-1 through TS-6 have the same data type definition, we are simply defining the behavior of the DTM data type in each of these cases. Would it not be more appropriate to define DTM-1 through DTM-6, and then have TS-1 through TS-6 reference the proper DTM-x?
+
TS-1 through TS-6 have the same data type definition, we are simply defining the behavior of the DTM data type in each of these cases.  
 +
 
 
== Recommendation ==
 
== Recommendation ==
 +
Would it not be more appropriate to define DTM-1 through DTM-6, and then have TS-1 through TS-6 reference the proper DTM-x?
  
  

Revision as of 16:28, 23 July 2012

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: Change request ID:
Standard/IG: Implementation Guide Artifact ID, Name:


Issue

Recommendation

Rationale

Discussion

Recommended Action Items

Resolution

Return to OO Change Requests page.

Submitted by: David Burgess Revision date: <<Revision Date>>
Submitted date: Mar-2012 Change request ID: OO CR080
Standard/IG: Implementation Guide Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>>

Issue

TS-1 through TS-6 have the same data type definition, we are simply defining the behavior of the DTM data type in each of these cases.

Recommendation

Would it not be more appropriate to define DTM-1 through DTM-6, and then have TS-1 through TS-6 reference the proper DTM-x?


Rationale

Discussion

Recommended Action Items

Resolution