This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20120620"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
==CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB==
 
==CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB==
Detailed review of the CMETs status, including the dates and results of prior reconciliartion leave us with a singular conclusion.  MnM must undertake to sponsor a Normative Ballot that includes all CMETs previously balloted (and '''mostly approved''') as Releases 3 through Release 7.  While the vast majority of these are "clean" (have no outstanding negatives), the package as a who9le has gone too long without ANSI-recognized completion.  There fore the only safe approach is to submit '''all of these''' for one more round of Normative review.
+
Detailed review of the CMETs status, including the dates and results of prior reconciliation leave us with a singular conclusion.  MnM must undertake to sponsor a Normative Ballot that includes all CMETs previously balloted (and '''mostly approved''') as Releases 3 through Release 9 -- everything since release 2.  While the vast majority of these are "clean" (have no outstanding negatives), the package as a whole has gone too long without ANSI-recognized completion.  Therefore the only safe approach is to submit '''all of these''' for one more round of Normative review.
  
MnM Should approve a project proposal to this end, and the submission of an NIB for the Septemeber 2012 ballot.
+
The balloting will include:
 +
* Language making it clear that all CMETS in releases 1 & 2 that have not been altered are considered a part of release 4.  (Thus obviating the need for reaffirmation)
 +
*Include a listing for each CMET in the ballot showing whether it :
 +
**has no negatives against it
 +
** had negatives but those were reconciled; or
 +
** have negatives that may still remain unreconciled (in which case, where possible, to list the negative
 +
*a Zip archive of all relevant reconciliation packages
  
 +
MnM Should approve a project proposal to this end, and the submission of an NIB for the September 2012 ballot.
  
 +
Andy Stechishin made motion to allow either:
 +
#Accept responsibility for hosting and reconciling a composite CMET ballot as outlined above under Project 887 that the TSC sponsored for CMET management; or
 +
#Authorize submission to TSC of an MnM PSS, which project will undertake this ballot and then conclude.
 +
 +
Second: Rob Hausam
 +
 +
Uninmous
  
 
{{:MnM Action Items from 201005}}
 
{{:MnM Action Items from 201005}}
  
 
==Adjournment==
 
==Adjournment==

Revision as of 20:33, 20 June 2012


M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)

Logistics

Join GoToMeeting at

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/701832453
Meeting ID: 701-832-453

Return to MnM Minutes

Agenda

CMETs Ballot Project Approval and of NIB

Detailed review of the CMETs status, including the dates and results of prior reconciliation leave us with a singular conclusion. MnM must undertake to sponsor a Normative Ballot that includes all CMETs previously balloted (and mostly approved) as Releases 3 through Release 9 -- everything since release 2. While the vast majority of these are "clean" (have no outstanding negatives), the package as a whole has gone too long without ANSI-recognized completion. Therefore the only safe approach is to submit all of these for one more round of Normative review.

The balloting will include:

  • Language making it clear that all CMETS in releases 1 & 2 that have not been altered are considered a part of release 4. (Thus obviating the need for reaffirmation)
  • Include a listing for each CMET in the ballot showing whether it :
    • has no negatives against it
    • had negatives but those were reconciled; or
    • have negatives that may still remain unreconciled (in which case, where possible, to list the negative
  • a Zip archive of all relevant reconciliation packages

MnM Should approve a project proposal to this end, and the submission of an NIB for the September 2012 ballot.

Andy Stechishin made motion to allow either:

  1. Accept responsibility for hosting and reconciling a composite CMET ballot as outlined above under Project 887 that the TSC sponsored for CMET management; or
  2. Authorize submission to TSC of an MnM PSS, which project will undertake this ballot and then conclude.

Second: Rob Hausam

Uninmous

Review Action Items For MnM

Note the following list, and amend the list to assign selected items:

Adjournment