This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Tooling GForge Re-evaluation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
Astechishin (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | =Tooling GForge Re-Evaluation= | |
[[Tooling_Work_Group| return to Tooling Main Page]] | [[Tooling_Work_Group| return to Tooling Main Page]] | ||
*see [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=804 Project Insight # 804] for Project Scope Statement | *see [http://www.hl7.org/special/Committees/projman/searchableProjectIndex.cfm?action=edit&ProjectNumber=804 Project Insight # 804] for Project Scope Statement | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Continue With GForge== | ||
| + | ====Description==== | ||
| + | Continue to use the current GForge provider but take actions to dramatically reduce disk usage | ||
| + | ====Cost==== | ||
| + | $9600/per annum | ||
| + | ===Discussion=== | ||
| + | ====Pro==== | ||
| + | *Least impact on members and committers | ||
| + | ====Con==== | ||
| + | *Provider has been unable to give details on where and what to 'reduce' | ||
| + | *We currently think we use some 20 GB but the provider states that we are close to 80% of our 90GB capacity | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==''Template for Alternative''== | ||
| + | ====Description==== | ||
| + | ====Cost==== | ||
| + | ===Discussion=== | ||
| + | ====Pro==== | ||
| + | *''add comment in favour of alternative'' | ||
| + | ====Con==== | ||
| + | *''add comment against alternative'' | ||
Revision as of 06:06, 13 October 2011
Contents
Tooling GForge Re-Evaluation
- see Project Insight # 804 for Project Scope Statement
Continue With GForge
Description
Continue to use the current GForge provider but take actions to dramatically reduce disk usage
Cost
$9600/per annum
Discussion
Pro
- Least impact on members and committers
Con
- Provider has been unable to give details on where and what to 'reduce'
- We currently think we use some 20 GB but the provider states that we are close to 80% of our 90GB capacity
Template for Alternative
Description
Cost
Discussion
Pro
- add comment in favour of alternative
Con
- add comment against alternative
