This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20110427 SAIF AP ConCall"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 146: Line 146:
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
 
'''Minutes/Conclusions Reached:'''<br/>
  
−
'''Coordinate message for communicating the SAIF AP in Orlando'''<br/>
 
−
*Austin presented his draft of his presentation points.
 
−
*Austin would like to present one, coordinated message regarding the SAIF AP.
 
−
*Hence, team members should forward any project updates to Austin and he’ll include it in his presentation.
 
  
 +
'''EHR and SAIF Presentation'''<br/>
 +
*Gary Dickinson presented the [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/saif-arch-pgm/docman/admin/?subdir=319 SAIF in Context of EHR Interoperability and Lifecycle Models document] (Filename: 110111Process-Record-Strata-Services.pdf)
 +
*Steve Hufnagel presented [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/saif-arch-pgm/docman/admin/?subdir=319 HL7 Artifacts within SAIF ECCF] (Filename: EHR-SFMHL7ArtifactsinSAIFECCF29110427.pptx)
 +
*Further discussions of SAIF Artifact Definitions can continue on the MNM call on Fridays at 1pm Eastern Time. (+1 770-657-9270  passcode 459876)
 +
*Next Step:  Have EHR join the SAIF Artifact Definition discussions.
  
−
'''Quality Plan PSS'''<br/>
 
−
*Target dates will most likely lag behind one cycle (e.g. trimester or 1 WGM)
 
−
*Austin not sure if we need a separate running Quality Plan, as the objective of the SAIF AP is to achieve Quality.
 
−
*So perhaps a goal of the SAIF AP is to achieve Quality.
 
−
*Jane:  Increasing quality and predictable quality in our artifacts.
 
−
*Austin:  This is achieved by governance being present.  The result of this would be to add scope to the Artifact Definition project.
 
−
*Additonal objective would be to ‘how to define it’s quality’.
 
−
*Jane:  Similar to the Security Cookbook, where we felt that instead of having a separate process, integrate security within the process.  *Quality could be conducted the same.
 
−
*Gregg: The Quality Plan contains metrics for deliverables as well as metrics for the process.  The 3rd component of the Quality Plan was to monitoring to insure things are getting better rather than worse.
 
−
*Would need to take aspects of the Quality Plan and insure they’re integrated into other projects.
 
−
<br\>
 
−
*Austin:  So the focus of the Quality Plan may change so that it becomes a subproject of the SAIF IG project.
 
−
*Will need to communicate to HL7 that the Quality Plan project will be folded into the SAIF IG project.
 
−
<br\>
 
−
*Austin: The more visible we make the quality metrics, the more attention they get from the HL7 community.
 
−
*Perhaps have publishing make a quality dashboard visible for the balloted item.
 
−
*Gregg: The TSC decides what is in/out of the ballot; the TSC could use the dashboard to remove an item from ballot.
 
−
*Lloyd:  We should probably create a rule that prevents an item from going to ballot prior to the TSC override.  Make sure the balloters are aware of a situation. 
 
  
 +
 +
'''Pilot Coordination updates (Rick Haddorff)'''<br/>
 +
*Dave and Rick will meet this week to work on the Pilot Coordination schedule.
 +
*CDA R3 and ITS coordination is one additional coordination item.
 +
 +
 +
'''Quality Plan PSS Feedback (Gregg Seppala)'''<br/>
 +
*Project Scope change tied the Quality project to the SAIF AP.
 +
*Project Dependancy identifies SAIF AP (project #751).
 +
*Success criteria should indicate criteria for each phase.
 +
*Jane: One success criteria could be:  Issues are known and are being addressed.
 +
*Target dates still need to be identified.  We probably shouldn’t document specific ones in this PSS, but rather have them have lag behind other related project’s deliverable target dates.
 +
*Steve H suggested to use the ECCF as a scorecard; others agreed.
 +
*Discussion will continue next week.
  
  

Latest revision as of 14:29, 5 May 2011

SAIF Architecture Program – 2011-04-27 Meeting

Return to SAIF Architecture Program Wiki Home Page<br\> Return to SAIF AP Meeting Minutes and Agendas

Meeting Logistics

Agenda

  1. Role Call
  2. Agenda Review
  3. EHR and SAIF Presentation (Steve Hufnagel, Gary Dickinson)
    1. SAIF in Context of EHR Interoperability and Lifecycle Models
  4. Quality Plan PSS Feedback (Gregg Seppala)
  5. Review project list to see if some should be brought in under the SAIF AP umbrella (#1855) - Deferred to next week's call
    1. How to go about this task?
      1. Assign as homework?
      2. Spend 10 minutes each meeting and walk thru by SD? (FTSD first)
  6. SAIF and Sound White Paper Feedback (Rick Haddorff) - Deferred to next week's call
  7. Pilot Coordination updates (Rick Haddorff)
    1. Any new Coordination items? (Team)
    2. Project Schedule progress (Rick Haddorff)
  8. Action item review (see below)
  9. Next steps

Action Items to Review

1865: Determine what steps needs to be completed to acquire the EA software<br\> 1868: Determine how to actually get the EA Software to the modelers. <br\> Last update from Jane: I will be following up with the Sparx contact to determine whether a process similar to the one we use for Rational would be acceptable." <br\> Jane: Anything new to report?<br\> Update from today's call: Jane hasn't been able to meet with Sparks rep as Sparks has been in New Zealand. She'll try to touch base with them this week and provide an update next week.<br\> <br\> 1862: Review the OO project and Create OO PSS's<br\> Last Update: Patrick to edit and send final versions to OO listserv for vote on 4/14 or possibly the call after (4/21)<br\> Patrick: Anything new to report?<br\> Update from today’s call: No update.<br\> <br\> Link to the Complete List of Action Items/Issues/Risks (GForge)

Meeting Attendees

X=Present on Call

Facilitator Austin Kreisler Note taker(s) David Hamill
Attendee Name Affiliation
X Austin Kreisler TSC Chair
Brian Pech Interested Participant
X David Hamill HL7 HQ / Program Manager
Ed Tripp Domain Experts SD \ TSC
X Gregg Seppala Product Quality Plan Project
X Jane Curry Tooling
Jim McClay Emergency Care
John Moehrke Security Cookbook
John Quinn HL7 CTO
X Lloyd McKenzie MnM Work Group / SAIF Implementation Guide Pjt
Lorraine Constable Composite Order Pjt \ OO Behavioral Framework Pjt
Patrick Loyd OO Work Group / Composite Order Pjt
X Rick Haddorff Project Services WG / SAIF Pilot Coordination Pjt
Robert Lario Object Management
X Steve Hufnagel ArB / SAIF Book Project / SOA
Wendy Huang Implementation Conformance WG
X Gary Dickinson EHR WG
X Pat Van Dyke EHR WG
Quorum Requirements Met: Yes

Minutes

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:


EHR and SAIF Presentation


Pilot Coordination updates (Rick Haddorff)

  • Dave and Rick will meet this week to work on the Pilot Coordination schedule.
  • CDA R3 and ITS coordination is one additional coordination item.


Quality Plan PSS Feedback (Gregg Seppala)

  • Project Scope change tied the Quality project to the SAIF AP.
  • Project Dependancy identifies SAIF AP (project #751).
  • Success criteria should indicate criteria for each phase.
  • Jane: One success criteria could be: Issues are known and are being addressed.
  • Target dates still need to be identified. We probably shouldn’t document specific ones in this PSS, but rather have them have lag behind other related project’s deliverable target dates.
  • Steve H suggested to use the ECCF as a scorecard; others agreed.
  • Discussion will continue next week.


Gforge Accounts can be requested via: http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/account/?action=UserAdd

Adjourned 11:02 AM Eastern Time

New Action Items

Steve – Send Dave Hamill his presentation - DONE
Dave – Upload Steve’s presentation to the SAIF AP GForge Docs site - DONE

Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=20110427_SAIF_AP_ConCall&oldid=50016"