Difference between revisions of "Jurisdiction ELR Specifications"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
(Although New York City is a distinct reporting jurisdiction, NYC labs are directed to report to New York State's Electronic Clinical Laboratory Reporting System (ECLRS); the NYC reports are extracted and downloaded to NYC via a PHINMS link.) | (Although New York City is a distinct reporting jurisdiction, NYC labs are directed to report to New York State's Electronic Clinical Laboratory Reporting System (ECLRS); the NYC reports are extracted and downloaded to NYC via a PHINMS link.) | ||
*[http://www.wadsworth.org/labcert/regaffairs/clinical/commdiseaseguide.pdf Laboratory Reporting Requirements] (oriented to Laboratorians, not IT) | *[http://www.wadsworth.org/labcert/regaffairs/clinical/commdiseaseguide.pdf Laboratory Reporting Requirements] (oriented to Laboratorians, not IT) | ||
| − | *ECLRS (ELR) specifications: specification manuals for | + | *ECLRS (ELR) specifications: specification manuals for 2.3.z and 2.3.1: updated versions to be provided. |
==Washington State== | ==Washington State== | ||
WA State does not have an ELR specification per se. We work with whatever HL7 version a lab can send, and the required content for both paper and electronic reports is specified in our reportable conditions rules at [http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=246-101 Chapter 246-101 WAC]. '''Note''': these rules have recently been revised; the new rules will go into effect 02/04/2011 and will be posted at that time. The revised rules include changes to the required report content. | WA State does not have an ELR specification per se. We work with whatever HL7 version a lab can send, and the required content for both paper and electronic reports is specified in our reportable conditions rules at [http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=246-101 Chapter 246-101 WAC]. '''Note''': these rules have recently been revised; the new rules will go into effect 02/04/2011 and will be posted at that time. The revised rules include changes to the required report content. | ||
Revision as of 22:19, 24 January 2011
Senders complain that the various ELR receiving jurisdictions have too many differing reporting format specifications, creating a large burden on sites that must send to multiple jurisdictions. To allow an understanding and analysis of the magnitude of this problem, I suggest that we collect on this page links to as many of these differing specifications as we can find. People can add discussion points to this page.
I note that most of the specs on this page will probably be for HL7 2.3.z and 2.3.1 ORU_R01 message formats. Although we will be able to learn from comparing these specs, it is probably not worthwhile harmonizing them; rather, the lessons here may help us avoid similar pain points in our upcoming 2.5.1 specs.
Michigan
New York State and New York City
(Although New York City is a distinct reporting jurisdiction, NYC labs are directed to report to New York State's Electronic Clinical Laboratory Reporting System (ECLRS); the NYC reports are extracted and downloaded to NYC via a PHINMS link.)
- Laboratory Reporting Requirements (oriented to Laboratorians, not IT)
- ECLRS (ELR) specifications: specification manuals for 2.3.z and 2.3.1: updated versions to be provided.
Washington State
WA State does not have an ELR specification per se. We work with whatever HL7 version a lab can send, and the required content for both paper and electronic reports is specified in our reportable conditions rules at Chapter 246-101 WAC. Note: these rules have recently been revised; the new rules will go into effect 02/04/2011 and will be posted at that time. The revised rules include changes to the required report content.
