This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "December 7, 2010 CBCC Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Finaversaggi (talk | contribs) m (→Agenda) |
Finaversaggi (talk | contribs) m (→Agenda) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#*[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Input_for_Policy_Advisory_Committee '''CBCC WG Input for Policy Advisory Committee'''] - forwarded to HL7 HQ for submission by December 10th deadline | #*[http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Input_for_Policy_Advisory_Committee '''CBCC WG Input for Policy Advisory Committee'''] - forwarded to HL7 HQ for submission by December 10th deadline | ||
#*'''CDA R2 Implementation Guide for Consent Directives''' - submit to TSC for DSTU publication | #*'''CDA R2 Implementation Guide for Consent Directives''' - submit to TSC for DSTU publication | ||
− | |||
#*'''SHIPPS Project Status''' | #*'''SHIPPS Project Status''' | ||
− | #** | + | #**'''December 9th Structure Documents Work Group Meeting''' - Collaboration Opportunity |
− | |||
#***SDWG will present a new eMeasures PSS. There may be an opportunity to collaborate with SDWG & the National Quality Forum (NQF) on this project in conjunction with SHIPPS | #***SDWG will present a new eMeasures PSS. There may be an opportunity to collaborate with SDWG & the National Quality Forum (NQF) on this project in conjunction with SHIPPS | ||
#***Richard will present the SHIPPS PSS to the SDWG to see if they are interested in participating and to see how the eMeasures and SHIPPS project relate to each other | #***Richard will present the SHIPPS PSS to the SDWG to see if they are interested in participating and to see how the eMeasures and SHIPPS project relate to each other | ||
+ | #**[http://healthlevelseven.projectinsight.net/l.aspx?ReturnUrl=%2fdefault.aspx '''Project Insight'''] - milestones added to project plan | ||
+ | #**'''Quality Measures Workgroup''' [http://healthit.hhs.gov/blog/faca/index.php/2010/12/06/quality-measures-workgroup-seeks-comment-on-clinical-quality-measures-concepts-for-stage-2-and-stage-3-meaningful-use-by-december-23-2010/ Request for Comment]. This is a new HIT Policy Committee Work Group. They are seeking feedback on clinical quality measures concepts by Dec. 23rd | ||
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== |
Revision as of 23:41, 6 December 2010
Contents
Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting
Meeting Information
Attendees
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll call, approve minutes November 30th, call for additional agenda items & accept agenda
- (55 min) Report out
- CBCC WG Input for Policy Advisory Committee - forwarded to HL7 HQ for submission by December 10th deadline
- CDA R2 Implementation Guide for Consent Directives - submit to TSC for DSTU publication
- SHIPPS Project Status
- December 9th Structure Documents Work Group Meeting - Collaboration Opportunity
- SDWG will present a new eMeasures PSS. There may be an opportunity to collaborate with SDWG & the National Quality Forum (NQF) on this project in conjunction with SHIPPS
- Richard will present the SHIPPS PSS to the SDWG to see if they are interested in participating and to see how the eMeasures and SHIPPS project relate to each other
- Project Insight - milestones added to project plan
- Quality Measures Workgroup Request for Comment. This is a new HIT Policy Committee Work Group. They are seeking feedback on clinical quality measures concepts by Dec. 23rd
- December 9th Structure Documents Work Group Meeting - Collaboration Opportunity
Minutes
1. Action Items
From last week:
- Ioana: draft CBCC WG response to HL7 HQ's request for response to the ONC Policy Advisory Committee related to Privacy Policies, Consents, and Confidentiality Terminology. The draft will be added to a wiki page and CBCC work group is invited to edit the draft. December 10 is the comment period deadline.
- Mary Ann: will report back as to whether Canadians are using the ConfidentialityByInfoType value set (ETH, HIV, PSY, SDV) of the HL7 Confidentiality concept domain
- Security WG: will take the lead on making recommendations related to the use of the ConfidentialityByAccessKind value set