Revision as of 15:53, 13 September 2010

Security Working Group Meeting

(05 min) Roll Call, Accept Minutes August 31st Security Work Group, Call for additional agenda items & Accept Agenda
(05 min) Pat Pyette - PASS Audit Update
(05 min) John Moehrke - John’s updates regarding the Risk Assessment
(50 min) Security and Privacy Ontology project
- Security Ontology discussion on LOINC table mapping to RBAC objects. Table provides a connection from the ontology to portions of (possibly) SNOMED CT which is part of the project scope.
- Updates from Tony.

Tony: Request administrative privileges to update GForge.
- Mike to approve once request has been submitted

No update today, but this ballot is now open. Please sign up to vote.

Tony has posted the first draft of the Security-Privacy Ontology expressed in OWL 2 and suitable for viewing with the Protégé 4.1 OWL Editor.

In addition, for those who are not using Protégé, there is a Word document with screen shots and other information.
- Corresponding wiki entries will be made after Tony Weida obtains proper wiki access.
- Tony will pass along files to Serafina and Suzanne until he is able to post on GForge.
- Tony will make a request to join the HL7 Security GForge space. Mike can then approve the addition.

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 No update today, but this ballot is now open.  Please sign up to vote.
 ====Security & Privacy Ontology Project====
+#LOINC to RBAC discussion:
+#*This discussion related to examining the LOINC objects to determine which map to HL7 permission catalog and how they would map to SNOMED CT.
+#*The purpose is to determine how we will use the ontology to link a different ontology (a bridge ontologies—which we may use or SNOMED CT directly)
+#*Question: Is this a new ontology vs. an update to the current ontology?
+#**Yes, we wouldn’t’ necessary put these items in the RBAC catalog directly — instead we should be able to map these terms to the various linkages, e.g., to SNOMED-CT.
+#*The premise is that the relationship to SNOMED-CT has been harmonized to LOINC.  Mike will check with the VA terminologies to confirm this assumption.
 Tony has posted the [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5828/7511/Ontologies.zip first draft] of the Security-Privacy Ontology expressed in OWL 2 and suitable for viewing with the Protégé 4.1 OWL Editor.
 *In addition, for those who are not using Protégé, there is a [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/5829/7512/HL7SecurityandPrivacyOntologyUpdate.doc Word document] with screen shots and other information.