Difference between revisions of "20100909 arb minutes"

Revision as of 21:58, 9 September 2010

Architecture Board September 9, 2010 Late Call

Time: 6:00pm U.S. Eastern

Or go to www.gotomeeting.com At the top of the page click on the join meeting button

Then enter Meeting ID: 535-702-651

2. Join the conference call: Dial 770-657-9270 Passcode 854126#

Tony Julian, Cliff Thompson, Tony Julian, Cliff Thompson, Jane Curry, Ron Parker, Andy Bond,

HL7 ArB Work Group Meeting Minutes Location: Telcon		Date: 20100909> Time: 6:00PM U.S. EDT
Facilitator	Ron Parker	Note taker(s)	Tony Julian

Attendee	Name	Affiliation
X	Bond,Andy	NEHTA
X	Curry, Jane	Health Information Strategies
.	Grieve, Grahame	Kestral Computing
X	Julian, Tony	Mayo Clinic
.	Koisch, John	Guidewire Architecture
.	Loyd, Patrick	Gordon point Informatics LTD.
.	Lynch, Cecil	ontoreason LLC
.	Mead, Charlie	National Cancer Institute
.	Nelson, Dale	II4SM
.	Ocasio, Wendell	Agilex Technologies
X	Parker, Ron	CA Infoway
.	Quinn, John	Health Level Seven, Inc.
.	Shakir, Abdul-Malik	Shakir Consulting
.	Guests
.	Hufnagel, Steve	U.S. Department of Defense, Military Health System
.	Koehn, Marc	Gordon point Informatics LTD
.	Laakso, Lynn	Health Level Seven International
X	Robertson, Scott	Kaiser Permanente
X	Thompson, Cliff	OntoSolutions LLC

Quorum Requirements Met: Yes

Agenda Topics

Call to order
Agenda review and approval
Review of minutes
Cambridge agenda
- From John K as in koncrete Koisch:
- I'd like to add a session (quarter? portion of a quarter?) to discussing the Project Services group and their efforts to incorporate SAIF
Item from Karen Smith
- A few weeks ago, Cliff updated the peer review comment spreadsheet for the Intro. (However, I found a few more comments that also apply to the Intro in the two ECCF spreadsheets that Charlie sent me last week.) Do you approve of the comment spreadsheet for the Intro? Would it be OK if Cliff and I begin updating the Intro tomorrow (after the ArB meeting)? Let's set aside a few minutes to discuss this at the ArB meeting today.
Distillation of Johns comments
Ron will have outline of practical presentation.
TSC agenda item on our learnings.
Other business and planning for next meeting
Adjournment

Minutes/Conclusions Reached:

Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
*Call to order

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 Tony Julian, Cliff Thompson,
+[[Category:Arb Minutes]]
+Tony Julian, Cliff Thompson, Jane Curry, Ron Parker, Andy Bond,
 [[Category:Arb Minutes]]
 ==ArB Minutes ==
@@ Line 43: / Line 45: @@
 |colspan="2"|'''Affiliation'''
 |-
-|.||Bond,Andy
+|X||Bond,Andy
 |colspan="2"|NEHTA
 |-
-|.||Curry, Jane
+|X||Curry, Jane
 |colspan="2"|Health Information Strategies
 |-
@@ Line 73: / Line 75: @@
 |colspan="2"|Agilex Technologies
 |-
-|.||Parker, Ron
+|X||Parker, Ron
 |colspan="2"|CA Infoway
 |-
@@ Line 115: / Line 117: @@
 *Agenda review and approval
 *Review of minutes
+* Cambridge agenda
+** From John K as in koncrete Koisch:
+**I'd like to add a session (quarter? portion of a quarter?) to discussing the Project Services group and their efforts to incorporate SAIF
 *Item from Karen Smith
 **A few weeks ago, Cliff updated the peer review comment spreadsheet for the Intro. (However, I found a few more comments that also apply to the Intro in the two ECCF spreadsheets that Charlie sent me last week.) Do you approve of the comment spreadsheet for the Intro? Would it be OK if Cliff and I begin updating the Intro tomorrow (after the ArB meeting)? Let's set aside a few minutes to discuss this at the ArB meeting today.