This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR003-597 OBX with PID in VXU"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
**If 1), not sure whether an OBX is appropriate or sufficient. How do we convey what is proposed to be ordered without the proposed service identifier(s). | **If 1), not sure whether an OBX is appropriate or sufficient. How do we convey what is proposed to be ordered without the proposed service identifier(s). | ||
**While reviewing we wonder whether the ORDER begin/end group should really be called VACCINATION begin/end group since it is not an order for a vaccination, rather the recording of one. | **While reviewing we wonder whether the ORDER begin/end group should really be called VACCINATION begin/end group since it is not an order for a vaccination, rather the recording of one. | ||
+ | *July 15, 2010 | ||
+ | **We need to change title as it only applies to VXU | ||
+ | **Proposal is to add OBX and NTE under a PID, have OBX under RXA, but not under PID. | ||
+ | **Need is to communicate specifically about the person, some could be sent in ORU or some that could be sent in ADT, but that would be second messages. | ||
+ | **The positioning is copied from ADT lay-out. | ||
+ | **Have not yet asked PHER, is scheduled. | ||
+ | **PHER has requested to always have PHER in loop when immunization v2.x proposals are discussed. | ||
+ | ***We’re happy to take considerations from domain experts, but decision rests with OO and invite them to OO calls, when needed. | ||
+ | **We can also just send over to them for review prior to our next call. | ||
+ | **Change name of the segment group to Patient or include (PID) in name | ||
Line 40: | Line 50: | ||
== Resolution == | == Resolution == | ||
+ | *July 15, 2010 | ||
+ | **Move to accept and forward to PHER for input, Rob Savage, Austin, further discussion: change name to Observation (for PID), | ||
+ | ***against:0, abstain:0, in favor: 12 |
Revision as of 14:02, 22 July 2010
Return to OO Change Requests page.
Submitted by: Rob Savage | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
Submitted date: 24-Apr-2008 | Change request ID: OO CR003 |
Standard/IG: Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Issue
See File:OO CR003-597.doc for problem definition and proposal.
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
- May 14, 2009
- Unclear what proposal is trying to achieve. We think it is:
- Add the ability to convey evaluation of immunization history and recommendations for next doses due. AND/OR
- Add additional observations about the patient that can help the provider/registry to assess whether to take further steps or not.
- If 2)
- Why not send an ORU with all this information?
- Also, may position it after IN group and before ORC.
- If 1), not sure whether an OBX is appropriate or sufficient. How do we convey what is proposed to be ordered without the proposed service identifier(s).
- While reviewing we wonder whether the ORDER begin/end group should really be called VACCINATION begin/end group since it is not an order for a vaccination, rather the recording of one.
- Unclear what proposal is trying to achieve. We think it is:
- July 15, 2010
- We need to change title as it only applies to VXU
- Proposal is to add OBX and NTE under a PID, have OBX under RXA, but not under PID.
- Need is to communicate specifically about the person, some could be sent in ORU or some that could be sent in ADT, but that would be second messages.
- The positioning is copied from ADT lay-out.
- Have not yet asked PHER, is scheduled.
- PHER has requested to always have PHER in loop when immunization v2.x proposals are discussed.
- We’re happy to take considerations from domain experts, but decision rests with OO and invite them to OO calls, when needed.
- We can also just send over to them for review prior to our next call.
- Change name of the segment group to Patient or include (PID) in name
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
- July 15, 2010
- Move to accept and forward to PHER for input, Rob Savage, Austin, further discussion: change name to Observation (for PID),
- against:0, abstain:0, in favor: 12
- Move to accept and forward to PHER for input, Rob Savage, Austin, further discussion: change name to Observation (for PID),