Difference between revisions of "CSCR-039 Add Responsible party participation"
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*Add particpation (RESP) from ActChoice to R_AssignedPerson [indetified/confirmable] CMET | *Add particpation (RESP) from ActChoice to R_AssignedPerson [indetified/confirmable] CMET | ||
**Include optional [1..] contextControlCode attribute with fixed value of AP | **Include optional [1..] contextControlCode attribute with fixed value of AP | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Rationale == | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Discussion == | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Recommeded Action Items == | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Resolution == |
Revision as of 06:59, 6 February 2006
- Submitted by: Heath Frankel
- Revision date:
- Submitted date: 6 Feb. 2006
Issue
Taken from Lloyd's email 2/2/06, "Use-case for RESP on allergy model"
There are many circumstances where people who are not fully licensed care providers will make decisions "under the supervision" of another care provider. Examples include:
Pharmacy technician recording a reported patient allergy to penecillin "under the supervision" of the pharmacist on duty at the time.
Medical student revises an allergy record changing from "allergy" to "intolerance" after hearing additional description of the reaction. The recording of the allergy is "under the supervision" of a licensed physician.
Note that "RESP" does not necessarily indicate that the provider took any concrete action, or even reviewed the data being recorded. It merely indicates "professional responsibility" for the action taken.
Recomendation
- Add particpation (RESP) from ActChoice to R_AssignedPerson [indetified/confirmable] CMET
- Include optional [1..] contextControlCode attribute with fixed value of AP