This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "September 2008 WGM Agenda CBCC Monday Q3"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
 
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call
 
#''(05 min)'' Roll Call
#''(05 min)'' Approved Minutes from [[September 9th, 2008 Conference Call]] ''unanimous''& Accept Agenda   
+
#''(05 min)'' Approved Minutes from [[September 9th, 2008 Conference Call]] ''18-0-0''& Accept Agenda   
 
#''(25 min)'' Update on the Permissions Catalog Project update
 
#''(25 min)'' Update on the Permissions Catalog Project update
 
* Draft framework document was reviewed by Mike Davis - LINK TO DOCUMENT   
 
* Draft framework document was reviewed by Mike Davis - LINK TO DOCUMENT   
Line 39: Line 39:
 
** Update the Composite Privacy Consent Directive "draft for comment" based on reconciliation comments based on current use cases  
 
** Update the Composite Privacy Consent Directive "draft for comment" based on reconciliation comments based on current use cases  
 
** Analysis Model based on the relevant [[Consent Directive Use Cases]]
 
** Analysis Model based on the relevant [[Consent Directive Use Cases]]
 +
 
==Action Item==
 
==Action Item==
 
* Ballot reconciliation
 
* Ballot reconciliation

Revision as of 23:50, 15 September 2008

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Attendees

  1. Stan Ratajczak
  2. Gyla Pyke
  3. David Staggs
  4. Manuel Metz
  5. Max Walker
  6. Laura Bright
  7. Suzanne Gonzales-Web Chair
  8. Bernd Blobel
  9. Paul Knapp
  10. Rob McClure
  11. Ioana Singureanu Scribe
  12. Patrick Pyette
  13. Mike Davis
  14. John Moehrke
  15. Marshall glen.f.marshall@siemens.com
  16. Kathleen Connor
  17. Heather Grain
  18. Neale Page

Updates

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call
  2. (05 min) Approved Minutes from September 9th, 2008 Conference Call 18-0-0& Accept Agenda
  3. (25 min) Update on the Permissions Catalog Project update
  • Draft framework document was reviewed by Mike Davis - LINK TO DOCUMENT
  • Project Space on HL7 Homebase: Security WG Project Space
  • We cannot use the SNOMED ontology to allow a security system to infer that if an object identified by its SNOMED code is present in a permission {operation, SNOMED}, that is child object are also inculded in that permission. This would put terminology inference in the security system. The SNOMED codes are not organized based on how restricted or sensitive the information is but by how clinicians relate to it.
  1. (25 min)
  • Consent Directive Use Cases (CBCC) - prioritize use cases. Currently the use cases focus on the the consumer but they also include the need for jurisdictions to exchange consent policy specifications.
  • We will use "eConsent" as user-friendly term that will have detailed analysis and design concepts behind.
  • All 8 Consent Directive Use Cases will be included in the analysis model targeted for January Ballot as follows:
    • Update the Composite Privacy Consent Directive "draft for comment" based on reconciliation comments based on current use cases
    • Analysis Model based on the relevant Consent Directive Use Cases

Action Item

  • Ballot reconciliation
  • Project Scope Statement for eConsent Project (will create a CMET to be exchanged both as messages and structured documents and can be used to describe the consent directive rules). We need to provide some deployment alternatives for consent directives relative to document and messages.
  • We need further definition for the last use case in the Consent Directive Use Cases

(20 min) Consent Directive Domain Analysis Approach Deferred - Domain Analysis Approach for eConsent


--Ioana13 14:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Back to Meetings