Difference between revisions of "201901 EBMonFHIR"
BrianAlper (talk | contribs) |
BrianAlper (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
===Share Summary of Findings data between two evidence reporting systems=== | ===Share Summary of Findings data between two evidence reporting systems=== | ||
− | :Action: <!--Who does what? (Use the role names listed above when referring to the participants --> | + | :Action: <!--Who does what? (Use the role names listed above when referring to the participants --> The Evidence Reporter will transmit a Summary of Findings table as a collection of one Evidence resource (Synthesis profile) and multiple EvidenceVariable, EffectEvidence and RiskEvidence resources; and the Evidence Consumer will receive it and reproduce the Summary of Findings table in their system's format. |
− | :Precondition: <!-- What setup is required prior to executing this step? --> | + | :Precondition: <!-- What setup is required prior to executing this step? --> None |
− | :Success Criteria: <!-- How will the participants know if the test was successful? --> | + | :Success Criteria: <!-- How will the participants know if the test was successful? --> The data displayed in the Summary of Findings results in the format of the Evidence Consumer is consistent with the results of the Evidence Reporter. |
− | :Bonus point: <!-- Any additional complexity to make the scenario more challenging --> | + | :Bonus point: <!-- Any additional complexity to make the scenario more challenging --> Bonus #1 can be sharing reference citations in a form that can be reproduced between systems. Bonus #2 can be developing a Recommendation profile to determine variations needed when the Evidence Consumer is a guideline developer. |
<!-- Provide a description of each task --> | <!-- Provide a description of each task --> |
Revision as of 12:22, 3 November 2018
Track Name
EBMonFHIR
Evidence Based Medicine on FHIR Orientation Video
Submitting WG/Project/Implementer Group
Clinical Decision Support WG
Justification
This is the second connectathon of the EBMonFHIR project. Implementers need to work together to confirm ability to share the most basic element of "Summary of Findings" reports used heavily across systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines. At the last Connectathon we created 4 resources (Evidence, EvidenceVariable, EffectEvidenceSynthesis, RiskEvidenceSynthesis) to meet this goal but found implementers not present found it confusing to implement.
We learned the need to make Profiles and perhaps an Implementation Guide and will focus the time on simpler implementations of the same basic use cases.
The EBMonFHIR project page can be found at http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=EBMonFHIR
Clinical input requested
Not needed but clinicians may find the Evidence-Based Medicine concepts being developed of high interest and clinicians helped improve the model at the last connectathon.
Related tracks
CDS Hooks and Clinical Reasoning tracks are likely to have overlap of interested parties but are not ready to be combined at this stage.
Proposed Track Lead
Brian Alper balper (at) ebsco.com brian.alper
See Connectathon_Track_Lead_Responsibilities
Expected participants
EBSCO Health
HarmonIQ
MedSide Healthcare
Qvera
potential participants from Europe - Cochrane, Duodecim, MAGIC, EvidencePrime
Roles
Please include information here regarding how much advance preparation will be required if creating a client and/or server.
Evidence Reporter
Transmit a summary of findings from medical research.
Evidence Consumer
Receive a summary of findings from medical research.
Scenarios
- Action: The Evidence Reporter will transmit a Summary of Findings table as a collection of one Evidence resource (Synthesis profile) and multiple EvidenceVariable, EffectEvidence and RiskEvidence resources; and the Evidence Consumer will receive it and reproduce the Summary of Findings table in their system's format.
- Precondition: None
- Success Criteria: The data displayed in the Summary of Findings results in the format of the Evidence Consumer is consistent with the results of the Evidence Reporter.
- Bonus point: Bonus #1 can be sharing reference citations in a form that can be reproduced between systems. Bonus #2 can be developing a Recommendation profile to determine variations needed when the Evidence Consumer is a guideline developer.