Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 12 September 2018"

Revision as of 14:50, 12 September 2018

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line		Date: 2018-09-05 Time: 4:00-5:00 PM ET
Facilitator	Jay Lyle	Note taker(s)	Jay Lyle

Attendee	Name	Affiliation
	Jay Lyle	JP Systems
	Yanyan Hu	Joint Commission
	Senthil Nachimuthu	3M
	Ken Lord	VA
	Rob Hausam	IMO
	Ben Hamlin	NCQA
	Lisa Nelson
	Emma Jones	Allscripts
	George Dixon	Allscripts
	Michelle Miller	Cerner
	Michael Padula	Cerner
	Stephen Chu

Agenda Topics

Actions

Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

Agenda for 8/22:

@@ Line 115: / Line 115: @@
 <!-- **** Delete instructions  and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES  ******-->
+# Physical impairment
 # Problem
-## No problems: CDA negated 'problem' = FHIR code "no problems". This seems unproblematic.
-## CDA can negate a specific problem
-### FHIR can negate a specific problem if there is a specific code (Diabetic retinopathy of eye not detected (situation))
-### Usually, there is a reason
-#### Refute a rule-out or suspected problem (verification status)
-#### Resolve a problem (clinical status)
-#### Some are just protocol questions: not pregnant, no night sweats.
-##### these are observations, not conditions. There doesn't seem to be a lot of need for specific negation of conditions.
-#### Use case: if CCDA contains "diabetes" negated, then what?
-##### How often does this happen?
-##### Engine needs to specify assumptions, e.g.,
-###### if it's a negated condition, it's not a condition; drop it, or
-###### only send negated conditions with histories that tell us whether to tag it as Resolved or Refuted
-# next week
-## Ken: no physical impairment
-## Jay: no problems (more examples)
 ===Meeting Outcomes===