This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Health Condition List"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Standard representation of how observations should be characterized (eg diagnosis vs problem) | * Standard representation of how observations should be characterized (eg diagnosis vs problem) | ||
* Standard representation of distinction and linkage between provider roles in problem lists (eg nursing problems vs physician problems). | * Standard representation of distinction and linkage between provider roles in problem lists (eg nursing problems vs physician problems). | ||
| − | |||
* Standard representation of common attributes about a problem (eg clinical status, problem severity, etc) | * Standard representation of common attributes about a problem (eg clinical status, problem severity, etc) | ||
* Methods for adding diagnosis specific attributes (eg Cancer Stage, CHF Class,...) | * Methods for adding diagnosis specific attributes (eg Cancer Stage, CHF Class,...) | ||
* Correct representation of problem modifiers and negation. (eg rule out MI, or history of MI vs AMI) | * Correct representation of problem modifiers and negation. (eg rule out MI, or history of MI vs AMI) | ||
* List maintenance issues in messaging. (eg send full list including history, send full list, but no history, only send updates for a concern) | * List maintenance issues in messaging. (eg send full list including history, send full list, but no history, only send updates for a concern) | ||
| + | * Correct relationships terms for episode links and sub-concerns. | ||
== Artifacts and related modeling == | == Artifacts and related modeling == | ||
Revision as of 22:25, 15 January 2008
Contents
Project Summary
Concern Tracking and Care statements provide a framework for tracking and managing health concerns, however there are many undefined relationships and representations that remain to be defined. Issues identified include.
- Standard representation of how observations should be characterized (eg diagnosis vs problem)
- Standard representation of distinction and linkage between provider roles in problem lists (eg nursing problems vs physician problems).
- Standard representation of common attributes about a problem (eg clinical status, problem severity, etc)
- Methods for adding diagnosis specific attributes (eg Cancer Stage, CHF Class,...)
- Correct representation of problem modifiers and negation. (eg rule out MI, or history of MI vs AMI)
- List maintenance issues in messaging. (eg send full list including history, send full list, but no history, only send updates for a concern)
- Correct relationships terms for episode links and sub-concerns.
todo: ISO 18104, ISO 22789, ISO 13940, CCD
