This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "June 6 - Clinical Mautirty Discussions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StephenChu (talk | contribs) |
StephenChu (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* Question raised on having one maturity model instead of two | * Question raised on having one maturity model instead of two | ||
: - Current FHIR FMG has published a FHIR maturity level | : - Current FHIR FMG has published a FHIR maturity level | ||
+ | :: [https://build.fhir.org/versions.html#maturity The 6 Level FHIR Matuirty] | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br> |
Revision as of 23:10, 13 June 2017
- Back to: Clinicians on FHIR - Sept 2017, San Diego
- Back to Clinician on FHIR 2017
Attendees:
- Stephen Chu (chair, scribe)
- Emma Jones
- Joe Quinn
- ...
Meeting Notes:
- Discussion on the need to develop and apply clinical maturity model to FHIR clinical resources assessment as value added contributions to the FHIR community at large
- - create clinical maturity model
- - publish results of FHIR clinical resources assessments using the clinical maturity model
- - published document/wiki as one-stop-shop for FHIR and clinical informatics communities
- Question raised on having one maturity model instead of two
- - Current FHIR FMG has published a FHIR maturity level