This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "FHIR Workflow Minutes CC"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst::FHIR Workflow Template for Minutes}}") |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[:Category:FHIR Workflow Minutes|Return to FHIR Workflow Minutes]] | [[:Category:FHIR Workflow Minutes|Return to FHIR Workflow Minutes]] | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
− | *Approve [[FHIR | + | *Approve [[FHIR Workflow_Minutes_CC_20160411| Minutes Prior Meeting on 04/11]] |
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
− | * | + | *Lloyd McKenzie (chair/scribe) |
− | * | + | *Andrea Pitkus |
+ | *Chethan Makonahalli | ||
+ | *Emmanuel Helm | ||
+ | *Jose Cota Teixeira | ||
+ | *Maranda Hoang | ||
+ | *Gary Dickinson - joined after minutes | ||
− | == | + | ==Minutes== |
− | + | Motion to approve minutes from Apr. 11: Andre/Jose - unan | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | ==Andrea's Scenario== | ||
+ | * Walked through Andrea's scenario | ||
+ | * Scenario didn't include any parent-child relationships (we had fulfillment relationships and links from Observations to Orders, but no situations where there was a need for a parent DiagnosticOrder and children DiagnosticOrders. Even in situations where the clinician was to order the 4 panels and group them under a requisition, a simple id to link them all together was sufficient. | ||
+ | * Discussed the need to have orders for the blood draws, but those would have "fulfills" relationships, so no complexity there. | ||
+ | * Talked about late additions to an order, but the impact of supporting that was no different whether we had a parent resource or only an identifier | ||
+ | * Group could see no reason to add support for having explicit resource instances to represent the "parent" in a composite order - a bare identifier seems to be consistent with v2 and meets all known use-cases. We'll reach out to the FHIR list to see if anyone has any additional use-cases before we lock this in stone. | ||
==Adjournment== | ==Adjournment== |
Latest revision as of 19:47, 14 April 2016
FHIR Workflow Conference Call 3:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)
Return to FHIR Workflow Minutes
Agenda
- Approve Minutes Prior Meeting on 04/11
Attendees
- Lloyd McKenzie (chair/scribe)
- Andrea Pitkus
- Chethan Makonahalli
- Emmanuel Helm
- Jose Cota Teixeira
- Maranda Hoang
- Gary Dickinson - joined after minutes
Minutes
Motion to approve minutes from Apr. 11: Andre/Jose - unan
Andrea's Scenario
- Walked through Andrea's scenario
- Scenario didn't include any parent-child relationships (we had fulfillment relationships and links from Observations to Orders, but no situations where there was a need for a parent DiagnosticOrder and children DiagnosticOrders. Even in situations where the clinician was to order the 4 panels and group them under a requisition, a simple id to link them all together was sufficient.
- Discussed the need to have orders for the blood draws, but those would have "fulfills" relationships, so no complexity there.
- Talked about late additions to an order, but the impact of supporting that was no different whether we had a parent resource or only an identifier
- Group could see no reason to add support for having explicit resource instances to represent the "parent" in a composite order - a bare identifier seems to be consistent with v2 and meets all known use-cases. We'll reach out to the FHIR list to see if anyone has any additional use-cases before we lock this in stone.