This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "FHIR Consent March 11, 2016"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 36: Line 36:
  
 
==Agenda==
 
==Agenda==
*Cochair introduction, roll, agenda and [FHIR Consent February 26, 2016]]minutes
+
*Cochair introduction, roll, agenda and [FHIR Consent February 26, 2016] minutes
 
* Report on FM's review of pre-applied changes to FM CP 9533  
 
* Report on FM's review of pre-applied changes to FM CP 9533  
 
* Discuss CP [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=9568&start=0 9568 CP 9568 Revise ConsentDirective.signer] modeling issues raised by John and responded to by Kathleen.  
 
* Discuss CP [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/project/fhir/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=9568&start=0 9568 CP 9568 Revise ConsentDirective.signer] modeling issues raised by John and responded to by Kathleen.  

Revision as of 16:41, 21 March 2016

Back to CBCC Wiki: Meetings

Back to HL7 FHIR Consent Directive Project

Attendees

Member Name Member Name Member Name
. Johnathan ColemanCBCC Co-Chair x Kathleen Connor FM Co-Chair x John MoehrkeSecurity Co-Chair
x Alexander Mense . Russell McDonell x Tarik Idris
. Marty Prahl . Diana Proud-Madruga . Pat Pyette
. Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair x David Staggs x Glen Marshall
. Rob Horn x Beth Pumo . William Kinsley
. Ken Salyards . unknown . unknown

Agenda

  • Cochair introduction, roll, agenda and [FHIR Consent February 26, 2016] minutes
  • Report on FM's review of pre-applied changes to FM CP 9533
  • Discuss CP 9568 CP 9568 Revise ConsentDirective.signer modeling issues raised by John and responded to by Kathleen.
  • Discuss progress on Plan for completing the draft of the PCD IG
  • What kind of a test plan would we like to see at a FHIR connectathon?
  • Any changes expecting to be tested at the next FHIR Connectathon need to be submitted into the build by March 27th.

Minutes

Plan is to only change Signature cardinality in the official version of Contract.signer to 1..* Rationale: We could not come up with any plausible use case were a signer to a contract would not also be a party. Any Contract.signer is a party to the Contract and must be specified. Paul moved, Andy seconded 0-0-3.

  • Would be good to put together a high-level consent test script for FHIR connectathon. Then specialize this with either Document Sharing workflow, or DAF/Argonaut workflow. This way we get people testing something they want to test, and we get them to test consent.