This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "FHIR Workflow Minutes CC 20160208"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " Category:FHIR Workflow Minutes __NOTOC__ =FHIR Workflow Conference Call 3:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)= :Category:FHIR Workflow Minutes|Return to FHIR Workflow Minute...") |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* Agreed on the above divisions and that it was reasonable to work towards "greater" consistency around what codes are used, what they're called and how they're defined. | * Agreed on the above divisions and that it was reasonable to work towards "greater" consistency around what codes are used, what they're called and how they're defined. | ||
* Began discussion of "entered in error". Will continue there on the next call | * Began discussion of "entered in error". Will continue there on the next call | ||
| − | + | * See Status spreadsheet [http://wiki.hl7.org/images/7/7d/Request_Status_Codes.xlsx] | |
==Adjournment== | ==Adjournment== | ||
Latest revision as of 22:41, 8 February 2016
FHIR Workflow Conference Call 3:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)
Return to FHIR Workflow Minutes
Agenda
- Approve Minutes Prior Meeting on 02/01
Attendees
- Lloyd McKenzie (chair/scribe)
- Bryn Rhodes
- Chethan Makonahalli
- Iryna Roy
- Jose Costa Teixeira
- Oliver Krauss
- Rob Hausam
- Eric Haas
- Russ Leftwich
- Gary Dickinson
- John Hatem
- Hans Buitendijk (joined after minutes)
- Scott Robertson (joined after minutes)
Minutes
Motion to approve minutes of Feb 1: Bryn/John 10-0-0
Statuses
- Spent most of the quarter talking about general approach of having 3 different homes for information that has historically been in status:
- Category (to differentiate Proposal/Plan/various types of orders)
- Task.status to reflect workflow statuses (requested, received, accepted, rejected, in progress)
- RequestResource.status to reflect the status of the authorization (draft, active, suspended, cancelled, completed)
- Agreed on the above divisions and that it was reasonable to work towards "greater" consistency around what codes are used, what they're called and how they're defined.
- Began discussion of "entered in error". Will continue there on the next call
- See Status spreadsheet [1]
