Difference between revisions of "201601 DiagnosticOrderandResults"
Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
These should be committed to SVN under trunk/connectathons/[connectathon] | These should be committed to SVN under trunk/connectathons/[connectathon] | ||
--> | --> | ||
+ | now required work on this |
Revision as of 20:21, 19 November 2015
Track Name
Laboratory Order and Result
Submitting WG/Project/Implementer Group
Orders and Observations Working Group
todo: See if any implementors interested
Justification
Implementer need:
todo - clarify grouping of observations such as components vs related and diagnostic reports.
Impact on ballot:
The OO workflow resourses DiagnosticOrder, ActionRequest, ActionResponse are the main focus of DSTU 2.1 and the 2106 connectathon. For DiagnosticReport, Observation, and Speicimen, any discovered issues as a result of the connectathon would be balloted as part of DSTU 3.0
FMM readiness of the resources:
- Diagnostic Order, Action (nee Order) and ActionResponse (nee OrderResponse) are FMM 1 and FMM 0 respectively - see above for discussion on Impact on ballot for these resources. These resource have not been the topic of any Connectathons to date and need to be exposed to testing to help understand the issues and potential solution for request and workflow resources. Specifically DiagnosticOrder contains a recursive structure of event which is unlike any other request resource in FHIR. One question is whether this can be handled better as a separate requests.
- DiagnosticReport and Observation are FMM3 and would benefit from being the focus of Connectathos to help move them forward to FMM4 as well as identify issues surrounding nested grouping of observation for cases such as culture and sensitivies.
- Specimen resource is FMM1 and has not been supported in any connectathon. This is needed to uncover issues with thi immature resource and help move it to FMM2
Proposed Track Lead
Eric M Haas
Skype: haas.eric1
others?
Expected participants
Organization:
- Labs? (solicit interested parties)
- Vendors?
Roles
Role 1 Name
>
Assumptions -
simplest case
Requestor pushes/pulls to
fullfiller pushes/pulls to
Requestor
Requestor pushes (resource) to intermediary endpoint
Intermediary polls endpoint and pushes action to fulfiller endpoint
fullfiller polls endpoint and fulfils and send report to intermediary endpoint
Requestor polls intermediary endpoint for results
think about pulling vs pushing
Requestor
Role1a: ????Lab Order requestor (server?): USLabOrder requester is the server, in other words, operating in 'Pull' or 'Push/Pull' RESTful interface. The USLabOrder Orderer MUST support querying one or more resources outlined by the USLabOrder Guide. The USLabOrder Orderer MUST use all the vocabularies and value set constraints defined by the individual resource profiles used by USLabOrder. The USLabOrder Orderer MUST implement REST behavior according to the FHIR specification and MUST be able to handle errors gracefully from Query Responders who may not support the submitted query.
Role1b: Lab Order requestor pull result from actionor??(client): USLabOrder requester is the server, in other words, operating in 'Pull' or 'Push/Pull' RESTful interface. The USLabOrder Orderer MUST support querying one or more resources outlined by the USLabOrder Guide. The USLabOrder Orderer MUST use all the vocabularies and value set constraints defined by the individual resource profiles used by USLabOrder. The USLabOrder Orderer MUST implement REST behavior according to the FHIR specification and MUST be able to handle errors gracefully from Query Responders who may not support the submitted query.
actionor
Role2a: Actioner ( Server ): USLabOrder Actioner is the server, in other words, operating in 'Pull' or 'Push/Pull' RESTful interface. The USLabOrder Orderer MUST support querying one or more resources outlined by the USLabOrder Guide. The USLabOrder Orderer MUST use all the vocabularies and value set constraints defined by the individual resource profiles used by USLabOrder. The USLabOrder Orderer MUST implement REST behavior according to the FHIR specification and MUST be able to handle errors gracefully from Query Responders who may not support the submitted query.
fulfiller'
Role3a: :
Role3b: Lab Filler ( Client ):
Scenarios
Scenario Step 1 Name
:Action:
see storybaord and above
:Precondition:
what needs to be in server where etc
:Success Criteria:
requester receive diagnostic report. Has to be some logic or some other party to play the role of fulfiller.
:Bonus point:
split order, reflex order, cancel/ update order.
add storyboard from Order functional model
glean out roles
TestScript(s)
now required work on this