This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 3 July 2015"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Michael tan (talk | contribs) (→Topics) |
Michael tan (talk | contribs) (→Topics) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*These tables have the purpose to show how it would look without the concept of concerns. | *These tables have the purpose to show how it would look without the concept of concerns. | ||
*The tables were reinstated in the DAM. | *The tables were reinstated in the DAM. | ||
| − | *We discussed the issue of concerns pointing to health care events of other patients. The use case of a transplantation was brought up. How do we deal with the observations of the donor patient? Michael will write a use case scenario of a kidney transplant and ask Larry and Stephen how this should be captured in a system. It is not clear if the current model can capture this requirement. An HC event | + | *We discussed the issue of concerns pointing to health care events of other patients. The use case of a transplantation was brought up. How do we deal with the observations of the donor patient? Michael will write a use case scenario of a kidney transplant and ask Larry and Stephen how this should be captured in a system. It is not clear if the current model can capture this requirement. An HC event always has a relationship to a patient. |
==Any Other Business== | ==Any Other Business== | ||
Latest revision as of 06:10, 3 July 2015
Health Concern Topic
Patient Care WG
July 3 2015
Attendees:
- Michael Tan – Chair
- David Pyke
- Jay Lyle
Participation Information Phone Number: +1 770-657-9270 Participant Passcode: 943377
Web Meeting Info www.webex.com Meeting number 230 634 425
Topics
- Discussed a forgotten ballot comment from Kathleen Connor about security and privacy issues.
- The DAM model does contain attribute confidentiality in Health Concern and Health Concern event.
- The comment was found persuasive with mod. The clarification of confidentiality is adjusted to comply to the comment.
- We discussed the removal of the tables in the scenario op chapter 7 of the DAM.
- These tables have the purpose to show how it would look without the concept of concerns.
- The tables were reinstated in the DAM.
- We discussed the issue of concerns pointing to health care events of other patients. The use case of a transplantation was brought up. How do we deal with the observations of the donor patient? Michael will write a use case scenario of a kidney transplant and ask Larry and Stephen how this should be captured in a system. It is not clear if the current model can capture this requirement. An HC event always has a relationship to a patient.
Any Other Business
- Looking at the diagram we wondered if the person now currently attached to health concern event, should be attached to health concern itself.
- Next weeks call is the last call before Michael's holiday.
Action items
- Review and adjust DAM document with Jay ( action David)
- Set up use case scenario for organ transplantation. ( action Jay)
Go back to health concern minutes: [[1]]
