This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "20150210 US Realm TF Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 39: Line 39:
 
| || Calvin Beebe || || Woody Beeler || || Keith Boone
 
| || Calvin Beebe || || Woody Beeler || || Keith Boone
 
|-
 
|-
| || Joe Bormel || ||Lorraine Constable|| ||Johnathan Coleman
+
| || Joe Bormel ||x||Lorraine Constable||x||Johnathan Coleman
 
|-
 
|-
 
| || Julie Crouse|| ||John Feikema|| ||  
 
| || Julie Crouse|| ||John Feikema|| ||  
 
|-
 
|-
|Regrets||Ed Hammond|| ||Tony Julian|| ||Paul Knapp
+
|x||Ed Hammond|| ||Tony Julian||x||Paul Knapp
 
|-
 
|-
| || Austin Kreisler|| ||Lynn Laakso|| || Ken McCaslin
+
|x|| Austin Kreisler|| ||Lynn Laakso||x|| Ken McCaslin
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  || John Quinn|| || David Susanto|| || Pat VanDyke
 
|  || John Quinn|| || David Susanto|| || Pat VanDyke
Line 82: Line 82:
  
 
===Minutes===
 
===Minutes===
+
*Discussion re: new Board committee for US Realm. How many people do we want? Lorraine suggests no smaller than eight so that quorum is easily reached. Ed suggested ten. Do we want to try to do what the FHIR groups have done, making sure there is vendor and affiliate representation? ArB, MnM, vendor and health providers? Austin wonders if it should be a governance group appointed by the board or a management group? Need an identified group to represent HL7 in the US government, states Ed. Need about 4 people at least to do that, with some overlap into this group. Discussion regarding usefulness of having non-US folks in the group. Discussion on coordination with upcoming changes in governance processes. Lorraine outlines potential nomination process; should include broad perspectives from the community. Ed suggests a rep from each product group is one option. Ed will take all suggestions and put together a draft for the Board. Lorraine will send Ed the call for nominations for FHIR. TSC will approve nominations.
 
+
*Pat Van Dyke gives an overview of the Pharmacist EHR-System Functional Profile Release 2. Are the only interested parties US realm? Pat says yes, especially NCPDP. NCPDP is looking for a joint standard – do we need an agreement? Raised question with Karen during WG meeting. Development will largely take place at NCPDP meetings. Johnathan moves to approve; Paul seconds. None opposed, no abstentions. Ed asks Pat to give a future update on how it goes working with NCPDP on this project.
 +
*Call adjourned at 1:30 pm
  
 
===Meeting Outcomes===
 
===Meeting Outcomes===
Line 99: Line 100:
  
 
| width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' ''
 
| width="100%" align="left" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|'''Actions''' ''
*   
+
*Ed to draft nomination process for review by the Board
 +
*Lorraine to send Ed the call for nominations that FHIR did to perhaps use as a model  
  
 
|-
 
|-

Latest revision as of 22:45, 13 February 2015

back to US Realm Task Force
back to US Realm Task Force Conference Calls

US Realm Task Force Call Agenda/Minutes

Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371#
929-752-237

Date: 2015-02-10
Time: 1 PM Eastern
Facilitator Ed/Ken Note taker(s) Anne
Attendee / Name
Calvin Beebe Woody Beeler Keith Boone
Joe Bormel x Lorraine Constable x Johnathan Coleman
Julie Crouse John Feikema
x Ed Hammond Tony Julian x Paul Knapp
x Austin Kreisler Lynn Laakso x Ken McCaslin
John Quinn David Susanto Pat VanDyke
Visitor / Name
no quorum definition

Agenda

Administrivia

  • Agenda review
  • Review notes from 20150203_US_Realm_TF_Call
  • Action Items
    • Group to email Ed with ideas regarding new group's mission and charter, process for defining membership in the group, defining scope, etc.

Discussion:

  • Review of any outstanding issues

Approval Items:

Minutes

  • Discussion re: new Board committee for US Realm. How many people do we want? Lorraine suggests no smaller than eight so that quorum is easily reached. Ed suggested ten. Do we want to try to do what the FHIR groups have done, making sure there is vendor and affiliate representation? ArB, MnM, vendor and health providers? Austin wonders if it should be a governance group appointed by the board or a management group? Need an identified group to represent HL7 in the US government, states Ed. Need about 4 people at least to do that, with some overlap into this group. Discussion regarding usefulness of having non-US folks in the group. Discussion on coordination with upcoming changes in governance processes. Lorraine outlines potential nomination process; should include broad perspectives from the community. Ed suggests a rep from each product group is one option. Ed will take all suggestions and put together a draft for the Board. Lorraine will send Ed the call for nominations for FHIR. TSC will approve nominations.
  • Pat Van Dyke gives an overview of the Pharmacist EHR-System Functional Profile Release 2. Are the only interested parties US realm? Pat says yes, especially NCPDP. NCPDP is looking for a joint standard – do we need an agreement? Raised question with Karen during WG meeting. Development will largely take place at NCPDP meetings. Johnathan moves to approve; Paul seconds. None opposed, no abstentions. Ed asks Pat to give a future update on how it goes working with NCPDP on this project.
  • Call adjourned at 1:30 pm

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
  • Ed to draft nomination process for review by the Board
  • Lorraine to send Ed the call for nominations that FHIR did to perhaps use as a model
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items


© 2014 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved