This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR172-832 OBX Grouping"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Riki merrick (talk | contribs) |
Riki merrick (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | [[Category:OO | + | [[Category:OO Accepted V2.8.2 Change Requests]] |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
Latest revision as of 02:07, 10 February 2015
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Hans Buitendijk | Revision date: <<Revision Date>> |
| Submitted date: October 15, 2014 | Change request ID: 172-832 |
| Standard/IG: Standard | Artifact ID, Name: |
Contents
Issue
Recommendation
See OBX Grouping for proposed approach.
Rationale
Justification
Discussion
Recommended Action Items
Resolution
From notes 10/16/2014:See document for changes - Motion to accept as updated. Jose Costa Teixeira, Mark Jones Discussion: • What are the choices for datatypes for codes: o IS, ID, CWE, CNE • Kathy prefers to just be able to send the code, • Freida sees the note about needign to be CWE only on IS, but not ID, • Consider changing datatype for OBX-30 from CWE to ID, which will also leave control of this in HL7 hands. Updated the proposal to ID for OBX-30. VOTE: Against: 0 ; Abstain: 2; In Favor: 13 Moved to InM since the datatype is part of their chapter. OO will add OBX-30.
