This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 16 October 2014"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " ==AGENDA== a. Ballot Reconciliation ===Ballot Reconciliation:=== #Page 24 – question 5 – Sub- concerns – what is the inferred relationship? A refined diagnosis is ...")
 
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  
 +
 +
=Health Concern Topic=
 +
'''Patient Care WG
 +
October 16, 2014
 +
'''
 +
 +
==Attendees==
 +
 +
*Michael Tan – Chair
 +
*Jay Lyle
 +
*Kevin Coonan
 +
*Emma Jones
  
 
==AGENDA==
 
==AGENDA==
Line 7: Line 19:
 
===Ballot Reconciliation:===
 
===Ballot Reconciliation:===
  
−
#Page 24 – question 5 – Sub- concerns – what is the inferred relationship?  A refined diagnosis is managed temporally, but a superclass (cancer) but may have multiple children.  If the two children are not related how is this represented?
+
*Dealt with comments from Emma Jones
−
##Concerns can be related
+
*the example of creating a accidentally is to demonstrate the requirement of merging and splitting concerns.
−
##Concerns can be subconcerns
+
*the creation of concerns is not always strictly controlled.
−
##Concerns are merged
+
*the group agrees that relationships between concerns is essential, but the exact details will be dealt with clinical modeling.
−
Disposition – Will reflect in clinical models in the future. (Considered for future use)
+
*the comments have been reviewed, but no vote was cast, because of the lack of quorum.
−
#Page 25 – renumber list to Scenario 1. (Persuasive)
+
*the reconciliation spreadsheet with ballot comments will be enclosed.
−
#Page 32 – Scenario 1 – suggestions for the scenario – will update as suggested. (Persuasive)
+
 
−
#Interaction Diagram – pages 15 and 16 – updated wording suggestion found persuasive. (Persuasive)
+
[[File:Totalcomments.xlsx]]
−
#Health Care Concern – Diagram 6 – Patient Component Relationship -- comment found persuasive with mod.  Will remove patient component relationship.
+
 
−
#Health Care Concern – Diagram 6 – Component Relationship Kind – will develop values for component relationship kind.
+
==AOB==
−
#Page 20 – Component relationship kind – will add note that values are not exhaustive. (Persuasive).
+
none
−
#Introduction – Row 4 – Comment re statement on goals – bullets are ambiguous.  Will reword to provide clarity. 
+
 
−
#Figure 1 – Request to clearly label the start date and end date to disambiguate the health concern start date and the condition start date. Recommend have health concern start date and condition start date. 
+
==Next call==
−
#Block vote – Michael/Jay – Against – 0, Abstain – 0, In favor - 4
+
 
 +
*planned for October 23d
 +
*the next call will focus on the model of concerns.

Latest revision as of 11:51, 22 October 2014


Health Concern Topic

Patient Care WG October 16, 2014

Attendees

  • Michael Tan – Chair
  • Jay Lyle
  • Kevin Coonan
  • Emma Jones

AGENDA

a. Ballot Reconciliation


Ballot Reconciliation:

  • Dealt with comments from Emma Jones
  • the example of creating a accidentally is to demonstrate the requirement of merging and splitting concerns.
  • the creation of concerns is not always strictly controlled.
  • the group agrees that relationships between concerns is essential, but the exact details will be dealt with clinical modeling.
  • the comments have been reviewed, but no vote was cast, because of the lack of quorum.
  • the reconciliation spreadsheet with ballot comments will be enclosed.

File:Totalcomments.xlsx

AOB

none

Next call

  • planned for October 23d
  • the next call will focus on the model of concerns.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=Conference_call_minutes_16_October_2014&oldid=92266"