This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Arden Syntax:Implementation Guide:Comparision to Others"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with " up")
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
[[wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Arden_Syntax:Implementation_Guide | up]]
+
[[Arden_Syntax:Implementation_Guide | go up]]
 +
= Arden Syntax related to other formalism or artifacts =
 +
 
 +
== External to HL7 ==
 +
 
 +
=== Asbru ===
 +
* Sources of information: [http://www.asgaard.tuwien.ac.at/index.html] [http://www.ifs.tuwien.ac.at/~silvia/pub/publications/mik_keml97.pdf] [http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/supplementary/1472-6947-14-39-s7.pdf]
 +
* Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There are prototype applications in diabetes, jaundice and breast cancer. [http://www.openclinical.org/gmm_asbru.html]
 +
* Are there implementations?: Yes. [http://www.asgaard.tuwien.ac.at/index.html]
 +
* Activ?: Latest publication is from 2009.
 +
* Standard?: No. Developed by the Vienna University of Technology and Stanford Medical Informatics.
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?:
 +
 
 +
=== Gaston ===  
 +
* Sources: [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2858861/] [http://www.openclinical.org/gmm_gaston.html]
 +
* Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There might be an implementation running on a hospital in the Netherlands. [https://www.catharinaziekenhuis.nl/nieuws/838-catharina-ziekenhuis-dringt-aantal-medicatiefouten-fors-terug.html]
 +
* Are there implementations?: Yes. [http://www.medecs.nl/products]
 +
* Active?: Latest publication is from 2004.
 +
* Standard?: No. Developed by Eindhoven University of Technology; Maastricht University; Medecs BV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?:
 +
 
 +
=== DeGel ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?: Unknown.
 +
* Are there implementations?: Yes. [http://medinfo.ise.bgu.ac.il/medlab/ResearchProjects/RP_DeGeLhtm.htm]
 +
* Active?: Latest publication is from 2013.
 +
* Standard?: No. Developed by Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?:
 +
 
 +
=== EON ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?:  Unknown. There was a trial at VA [http://www.chce.research.va.gov/athena.htm] [https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00374452].
 +
* Are there implementations?: Unknown.
 +
* Active?: No.
 +
* Standard?: No. Developed by Stanford Medical Informatics.
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?:
 +
 
 +
=== GLARE ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?: Unknown. No sources found. 
 +
* Are there implementations?: Unknown.
 +
* Active?: Latest publication is from 2012.
 +
* Standard?: No.
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?:
 +
 
 +
=== GLIF  ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?: 
 +
* Are there implementations?:
 +
* Active?: Latest publication is from
 +
* Standard?:
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?: Yes.
 +
 
 +
=== GUIDE  ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?:  No.
 +
* Are there implementations?: Unknown. [http://www.labmedinfo.org/projects/guide]
 +
* Active?: Latest publication is from
 +
* Standard?: No.
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?:
 +
 
 +
=== HELEN  ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?:  No.
 +
* Are there implementations?: Yes. [http://www.klinikum.uni-heidelberg.de/Installation-alt.100213.0.html]
 +
* Active?: Latest publication is from 2005.
 +
* Standard?: No.
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?:
 +
 
 +
=== PROforma ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?:  Yes. [http://archive.cossac.org/proformaInUse.html] [http://opencab1.miniserver.com:8080/tallis-enactment-1.7.2/Welcome.close]
 +
* Are there implementations?: Yes.
 +
* Active?: Yes.
 +
* Standard?: No.
 +
* Links: [http://cordis.europa.eu/result/rcn/26242_en.html]
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?: Yes.
 +
 
 +
=== PRODIGY ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?:  Yes. UK only.
 +
* Are there implementations?: Yes. [http://prodigy.clarity.co.uk/]
 +
* Active?: Discontinued.
 +
* Standard?: No.
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?: No.
 +
 
 +
=== SAGE  ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There were some prototypes. 
 +
* Are there implementations?: Yes [http://sage.wherever.org/].
 +
* Active?: Unknown.
 +
* Standard?: No.
 +
* Links: [http://sage.wherever.org/]
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?:
 +
 
 +
=== SEBASTIAN ===
 +
* Is it in practical use?:  Unknown.
 +
* Are there implementations?: Yes.
 +
* Active?: Unknown.
 +
* Standard?: Uses standards.
 +
* Links:
 +
* Should we compare Arden to it?: Yes.

Latest revision as of 23:06, 19 January 2015

go up

Arden Syntax related to other formalism or artifacts

External to HL7

Asbru

  • Sources of information: [1] [2] [3]
  • Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There are prototype applications in diabetes, jaundice and breast cancer. [4]
  • Are there implementations?: Yes. [5]
  • Activ?: Latest publication is from 2009.
  • Standard?: No. Developed by the Vienna University of Technology and Stanford Medical Informatics.
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?:

Gaston

  • Sources: [6] [7]
  • Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There might be an implementation running on a hospital in the Netherlands. [8]
  • Are there implementations?: Yes. [9]
  • Active?: Latest publication is from 2004.
  • Standard?: No. Developed by Eindhoven University of Technology; Maastricht University; Medecs BV, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?:

DeGel

  • Is it in practical use?: Unknown.
  • Are there implementations?: Yes. [10]
  • Active?: Latest publication is from 2013.
  • Standard?: No. Developed by Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?:

EON

  • Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There was a trial at VA [11] [12].
  • Are there implementations?: Unknown.
  • Active?: No.
  • Standard?: No. Developed by Stanford Medical Informatics.
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?:

GLARE

  • Is it in practical use?: Unknown. No sources found.
  • Are there implementations?: Unknown.
  • Active?: Latest publication is from 2012.
  • Standard?: No.
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?:

GLIF

  • Is it in practical use?:
  • Are there implementations?:
  • Active?: Latest publication is from
  • Standard?:
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?: Yes.

GUIDE

  • Is it in practical use?: No.
  • Are there implementations?: Unknown. [13]
  • Active?: Latest publication is from
  • Standard?: No.
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?:

HELEN

  • Is it in practical use?: No.
  • Are there implementations?: Yes. [14]
  • Active?: Latest publication is from 2005.
  • Standard?: No.
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?:

PROforma

  • Is it in practical use?: Yes. [15] [16]
  • Are there implementations?: Yes.
  • Active?: Yes.
  • Standard?: No.
  • Links: [17]
  • Should we compare Arden to it?: Yes.

PRODIGY

  • Is it in practical use?: Yes. UK only.
  • Are there implementations?: Yes. [18]
  • Active?: Discontinued.
  • Standard?: No.
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?: No.

SAGE

  • Is it in practical use?: Unknown. There were some prototypes.
  • Are there implementations?: Yes [19].
  • Active?: Unknown.
  • Standard?: No.
  • Links: [20]
  • Should we compare Arden to it?:

SEBASTIAN

  • Is it in practical use?: Unknown.
  • Are there implementations?: Yes.
  • Active?: Unknown.
  • Standard?: Uses standards.
  • Links:
  • Should we compare Arden to it?: Yes.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.hl7.org/w/index.php?title=Arden_Syntax:Implementation_Guide:Comparision_to_Others&oldid=95307"