August 12, 2014 CBCC Conference Call

Community-Based Collaborative Care Working Group Meeting

Back to CBCC Main Page

Attendees

x	Member Name		x	Member Name		x	Member Name		x	Member Name
x	Johnathan ColemanCBCC Interim Co-Chair		x	Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-Chair		x	Jim KretzCBCC Interim Co-Chair		.	Max WalkerCBCC Co-Chair
.	Wende Baker		.	Bill Braithwaite, MD		x	Kathleen Connor		.	Daniel Crough
.	Steve Eichner		x	Rick Grow		.	Mohammed Jafari		.	Tracy Leeper
.	Lisa Nelson		x	Mike Lardiere		x	Diana Proud-Madruga		.	Harry Rhodes
.	Lori Simon		.	Ioana Singureanu		.	Tony Weida		.	Brian Newton (Healthwise San Francisco), invited by Mike Ladariere
.	Maryann Juurlink		.	Steve Daviss		.	Kate Wetherby		x	Neelima Chennamaraja
.	Dina Passman		x	Serafina Versaggi		.	Marlowe Greenberg		.	Chris Clark, WV
.	Ken Ortbals		.	Matt Peeling		x	Tim McKay		.	.
.	Hady Khorasani		x	David Henkel		.	Amanda Nash		.	_Bob Yencha
.	Julia Chan, Pharmacist		.	_		.	_		.	_

Back to CBCC Main Page

Agenda

1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve [June 29, 20
2. (15 min) Data Provenance Update
3. (10 min) PSS Patient Friendly Natural Language
4. (05 min;;) Privacy Consent Directives - Ballot Reconciliation

Meeting Minutes

Motion to approve Meeting Minutes for August 5 (Johnathan/Kathleen) Objections: none ; Abstentions: none; Unanimous approval

Data Provenance Update

• Ballot is open, voting has started HL7 Ballot Schedule Countdown
• Johnathan recognized the great effort and job well done
• 151 voters in the Data Provenance poll

Patient Friendly Natural Language PSS - presentation by Suzanne and David

• Aim is to get something that security and privacy can use to translate consent directives. One of the general issues is that patient language is not always standardized.

• Comment from Serafina: “Yeah, sure” won’t always work. It could be transformed into affirmative, but what also has to be standardized is, you said, “Is it okay if Dr. So-and-So looks at your lab work?” What do you mean “looks at your lab work?” I think what you do has to be more standardized and understandable because I’m not sure that if you tell the patient “Is it okay for me to look at your lab work?” they will understand that it means that another person is going to get that lab work, and what they are going to do with the work that they have. That’s what also has to be standardized, doesn’t it?

• Additional comment from Serafina: My concern is that you can’t ask the questions unless the patient understands what the questions are about. I think that the process has to help inform people on what’s the standard. It’s the means of actually educating people about the scope, the environment.

• Comment from Kathleen: Do we have a facilitator walking us through to actually create the FHIR resource? I’d really like to get a timeline and milestones for that.

Privacy Consent Directives ballot reconciliation update

• Johnathan said that draft dispositions appear on the ballot reconciliation spreadsheet, but the dispositions have not been agreed on. No action has been taken on them. No approval has been sought on any of the dispositions.

• Neelima and Ioana will continue to work on the dispositions, and then come back to the WG with dispositions we can review and approve.

• Suzanne said we could go through some of the items at next week’s meeting, and possibly take a vote as a group on the dispositions.

Meeting Adjourned at 10:46 PDT

Additional minutes provided by --Rgrow (talk) 18:06, 14 August 2014 (UTC)