Difference between revisions of "Conference call minutes 10 July 2014"
Michael tan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=Health Concern Topic= '''Patient Care WG''' '''July 10, 2014''' ==Attendees== *Michael Tan – Chair *Elaine Ayres – Scribe *Stephen Chu *Sharon Solomon *Becky Angeles *Ja...") |
Michael tan (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Will retain the comparative analysis in the appendix. | Will retain the comparative analysis in the appendix. | ||
| − | Michael – on leave as of the 21 for three weeks, Jay on leave the week of the 14th. Jay will take ownership of the document for publication. Elaine will help with editing. Note – questions in the document and on the wiki. To streamline document – look at scenarios that are similar or portray similar concepts. There are four that seem to be unnecessary. In the introduction – list the scenarios and what the point of the use case is. | + | Michael – on leave as of the 21 for three weeks, Jay on leave the week of the 14th. Jay will take ownership of the document for publication. Elaine will help with editing. Note – questions in the document and on the wiki. To streamline document – look at scenarios that are similar or portray similar concepts. There are four that seem to be unnecessary. In the introduction – list the scenarios and what the point of the use case is. |
| + | |||
| + | Jay has placed some questions on the wiki. Questions need to be answered by key contributors. | ||
==Action items== | ==Action items== | ||
Latest revision as of 10:12, 11 July 2014
Health Concern Topic
Patient Care WG July 10, 2014
Attendees
- Michael Tan – Chair
- Elaine Ayres – Scribe
- Stephen Chu
- Sharon Solomon
- Becky Angeles
- Jay Lyle
- Kevin Coonan
Minutes:
From June 26 and July 3 up for approval: Move: Stephen/Elaine Abstain - 0 Object - 0 Approve - 5
Discussion
Contsys – Jay has received the updated specs. The comparison table can be completed. Discussed use of Contsys specs internally. It is called a health issue, not a health concern.
Jay has worked through the modeling and has many questions. Group again noted that the mind map should be removed in deference to the conceptual model. A DAM is conceptual in nature, not a logical model for implementation.
The DAM document has been streamlined with the various scenarios moved to the end. Do we need to add functional requirements -- they are in there. We do have draft requirements and draft use cases.
Becky Angeles – has offered to help Jay with Enterprise Architect – e.g. export without unnecessary meta data. We will continue to work on the document.
Will retain the comparative analysis in the appendix.
Michael – on leave as of the 21 for three weeks, Jay on leave the week of the 14th. Jay will take ownership of the document for publication. Elaine will help with editing. Note – questions in the document and on the wiki. To streamline document – look at scenarios that are similar or portray similar concepts. There are four that seem to be unnecessary. In the introduction – list the scenarios and what the point of the use case is.
Jay has placed some questions on the wiki. Questions need to be answered by key contributors.
Action items
- Michael re document clean-up.
- Kevin – 24 hours
- Elaine – 24 hours
- Becky – 24 hours (format export)
- Michael/Stephen -
- Jay – final submission
Conference calls: Will continue
