This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "June 4, 2013 Security Working Group Conference Call"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
==Meeting Minutes== | ==Meeting Minutes== | ||
'''Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda''' | '''Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda''' | ||
| − | * 5/28 meeting minutes will be approved at next meeting | + | * 5/28 meeting minutes will be approved at next meeting |
'''Review of Security and Privacy Ontology ''' -Tony Weida | '''Review of Security and Privacy Ontology ''' -Tony Weida | ||
Latest revision as of 16:38, 7 June 2013
Contents
Security Working Group Meeting
Attendees
- Bill Braithwaite
- Johnathan Coleman
- Kathleen Connor
- Mike Davis Security Co-chair
- Brian Handspicker, NY ITS
- Suzanne Gonzales-Webb CBCC Co-chair
- [mailto: Mohammad Jafari]
- Adrianne James
- Richard Thoreson CBCC Co-chair
- Tony Weida
Agenda
- (05 min) Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda (
- (15 min) Review of Security and Privacy Ontology -Tony Weida
- (15 min) Item2
- (15 min) Item3
- (05 min) Other Business
Meeting Minutes
Roll Call, Approve Minutes & Accept Agenda
- 5/28 meeting minutes will be approved at next meeting
Review of Security and Privacy Ontology -Tony Weida
- Suggestion for Resolution of Weida Comments <<add link to ballot reconciliation sheet>>
WG discussion of negative majors during future meetings in this order:
- Agreement made on planned steps to reconcile John’s and my remaining comments as outlined below.
- WG discussion of negative majors during future meetings in this order:
- Comment 51 was resolved as persuasive.
- Comment 55: WG review and agreement on conformance statements in the sections covering specific sub-ontologies.
- Comment 58: Resolve name collisions between classes derived from CSP-DAM and from root classes in HL7 vocabularies.
- Comment 48: Spell out use of OWL logical constructs to formulate policies.
- Comment 60: Refine operation hierarchy (see also Comment 18).
- Block vote on the draft resolutions of the negative minors (after any discussion requested by WG members).
- Block vote on the draft resolutions of the affirmatives (after any discussion requested by WG members).
- Continued discussion of Comment 17 on the Clinical Condition sub-ontology, and proposed resolution TBD in consideration of the HCS approach.
Ballot Reconciliation for HCS - Kathleen
<<add link to ballot reconciliation sheet>>
Item3
Other Business
