This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20130529 BAM Modeling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "TSC representatives and ArB to jointly develop content for the BAM for the Product Line Architecture Program {|border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" <!---==================...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
===============================================================================---> | ===============================================================================---> | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |x|| Calvin Beebe |
|- | |- | ||
| || Woody Beeler | | || Woody Beeler | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| ||Bo Dagnall | | ||Bo Dagnall | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | || Jean Duteau, |
|- | |- | ||
| || Tony Julian | | || Tony Julian | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Austin Kreisler, | + | |x || Austin Kreisler, |
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Lynn Laakso | + | | x|| Lynn Laakso |
|- | |- | ||
| || Cecil Lynch | | || Cecil Lynch | ||
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| || Ravi Natarajan | | || Ravi Natarajan | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Ron Parker | + | |x || Ron Parker |
|- | |- | ||
− | | || Brian Pech | + | | x|| Brian Pech |
|- | |- | ||
| || Melva Peters | | || Melva Peters | ||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
===Agenda=== | ===Agenda=== | ||
Agenda | Agenda | ||
− | *Review minutes of [[ | + | *Review minutes of [[20130522_BAM Modeling]] |
*update of ArB a-ha moment on three axes of product platform as a paradigm (technology binding/context); product line as a business domain (Function), and product family as a methodology (Form) | *update of ArB a-ha moment on three axes of product platform as a paradigm (technology binding/context); product line as a business domain (Function), and product family as a methodology (Form) | ||
*Discuss Security Risk Assessment Cookbook process | *Discuss Security Risk Assessment Cookbook process | ||
Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
+ | Need to identify deliverables on | ||
+ | *notional definition of what that product family/line would be | ||
+ | *How you will stand up Governance, how you will stand up Management, how to stand up methodology. Agenda division, or governance one meeting/month, etc? | ||
+ | *high-level market segmentation and statement of what they value, what constitutes success | ||
+ | *PSS they would declare the interested parties, who are the customers, etc | ||
+ | *Risks of doing or not doing the effort should be elucidated | ||
+ | Ron joins | ||
+ | *Next week's SDWG cochairs call is showing unavailability for several cochairs. We can put this off to discuss next week what they need to do to develop a PSS. | ||
+ | *First phase is planning on how one will stand up a product family, where the second phase is actually standing it up. | ||
+ | *Austin in crunch mode for CDA R3 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Adjourned 2:25 PM | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== |
Latest revision as of 18:24, 29 May 2013
TSC representatives and ArB to jointly develop content for the BAM for the Product Line Architecture Program
HL7 BAM Modeling Call Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2013-05-29 Time: 2 pm Eastern Time | ||
Facilitator | Ron Parker | Note taker(s) | Lynn |
Attendee | Name
| ||
x | Calvin Beebe | ||
Woody Beeler | |||
Jane Curry | |||
Bo Dagnall | |||
Jean Duteau, | |||
Tony Julian | |||
x | Austin Kreisler, | ||
x | Lynn Laakso | ||
Cecil Lynch | |||
Ravi Natarajan | |||
x | Ron Parker | ||
x | Brian Pech | ||
Melva Peters | |||
Quorum Requirements Met: (yes/No) | |||
quorum definition? |
Agenda
Agenda
- Review minutes of 20130522_BAM Modeling
- update of ArB a-ha moment on three axes of product platform as a paradigm (technology binding/context); product line as a business domain (Function), and product family as a methodology (Form)
- Discuss Security Risk Assessment Cookbook process
- Update on Tasks identified in last discussion
- Presentation at SDWG cochairs call on setting up PSS for the CDA R2 IG product family.
- Present a chopped down version of Governance 101 along with concrete suggestions on what to do with their agenda especially separating out governance and management and teasing out methodology as well.
- Need BAM checklist for initiation of PSS for CDA IG Product Family and identify deliverables of the project WRT goals/objectives/risks, RACI chart. List of things you need to establish as part of the project.
Reference Documents
- BAM Overview BAM status as of Jan WGM
- Fill in spreadsheet
Minutes
Need to identify deliverables on
- notional definition of what that product family/line would be
- How you will stand up Governance, how you will stand up Management, how to stand up methodology. Agenda division, or governance one meeting/month, etc?
- high-level market segmentation and statement of what they value, what constitutes success
- PSS they would declare the interested parties, who are the customers, etc
- Risks of doing or not doing the effort should be elucidated
Ron joins
- Next week's SDWG cochairs call is showing unavailability for several cochairs. We can put this off to discuss next week what they need to do to develop a PSS.
- First phase is planning on how one will stand up a product family, where the second phase is actually standing it up.
- Austin in crunch mode for CDA R3
Adjourned 2:25 PM
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items |
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.