This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "20130220 FGB concall"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | |colspan="2"|Chair/CTO ||colspan="2"|Members ||colspan="2"|Members | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | ||Ron Parker|| ||George (Woody) Beeler|| regrets||Ewout Kramer | + | |x ||Ron Parker||x ||George (Woody) Beeler||regrets ||Ewout Kramer |
|- | |- | ||
| ||John Quinn || ||Grahame Grieve|| || | | ||John Quinn || ||Grahame Grieve|| || | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |colspan=" | + | |colspan="2" rowspan="2"|observers/guests |
| − | | ||Austin Kreisler | + | |x ||Austin Kreisler |
| + | |- | ||
| + | |x||Lynn Laakso, scribe | ||
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 35: | Line 37: | ||
**Ron to collaborate with Grahame on [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7223/10126/HL7FHIRRiskAssessment.docx risk assertions] for FHIR and draft precepts; check back next week. | **Ron to collaborate with Grahame on [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7223/10126/HL7FHIRRiskAssessment.docx risk assertions] for FHIR and draft precepts; check back next week. | ||
*FMG update - | *FMG update - | ||
| − | |||
*Methodology update- | *Methodology update- | ||
*Review precepts, associated governance points and risks | *Review precepts, associated governance points and risks | ||
| Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
*#*What is the appeal process for resources not chosen for inclusion in the ballot? | *#*What is the appeal process for resources not chosen for inclusion in the ballot? | ||
*#*What is the appeal / escalation process for Management decisions? | *#*What is the appeal / escalation process for Management decisions? | ||
| − | *#*What is the appeal / escalation process for Governance decisions?Responsibilities for resources (education, conformity process, appeal process) | + | *#*What is the appeal / escalation process for Governance decisions? Responsibilities for resources (education, conformity process, appeal process) |
==Minutes== | ==Minutes== | ||
| − | Convened at | + | Convened at 5:07 PM |
| + | *Roll call - quorum not achieved | ||
| + | *Review changes identified in last week's discussion and incorporate Grahame's suggestions into the [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7248/10181/HL7FHIRRiskAssessment20130220.docx HL7 FHIR Risk Assessment] | ||
| + | **Need to review existing open source community strategies for forking - ACTION ITEM: need to assign this review to someone | ||
| + | **Review document for completeness on next call and transform to TSC Risk Assessment template and iterate the evaluation using those criteria | ||
| − | * | + | *adjourned 6:01 PM |
===Next Steps=== | ===Next Steps=== | ||
| Line 58: | Line 63: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Actions''' ''(Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)''<br/> | ||
| − | * | + | *Need to review existing open source community strategies for forking (not assigned) |
|- | |- | ||
|colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |colspan="4" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
| − | * | + | *[[20130227 FGB concall]] |
| + | *Review [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7248/10181/HL7FHIRRiskAssessment20130220.docx updated risk assessment] for completeness and migrate to Risk Assessment template | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 23:10, 20 February 2013
| HL7 TSC FGB Meeting Minutes Location: call 770-657-9270 using code 985371# |
Date: 2013-02-20 Time: 5:00 PM U.S. Eastern | |
| Facilitator: Ron Parker | Note taker(s): Lynn Laakso | |
| Quorum = Chair plus 2 | yes/no | ||||
| Chair/CTO | Members | Members | |||
| x | Ron Parker | x | George (Woody) Beeler | regrets | Ewout Kramer |
| John Quinn | Grahame Grieve | ||||
| observers/guests | x | Austin Kreisler | |||
| x | Lynn Laakso, scribe | ||||
Agenda
- Roll call -
- Agenda Review
- Approve minutes of 20130213 FGB concall
- Action Item review:
- Ron to speak with PIC regarding “help wanted” wiki development.
- Grahame will have patent position for next week's review.
- Check on Grahame's description next week of the nature of relationship with IHE and what to accomplish needs a couple paragraphs from Grahame to go to Chuck Jaffe.
- Ron and John to remind Chuck we intend to proceed with IHE plan and then draft for him some guidance for his endorsement
- Ron to collaborate with Grahame on risk assertions for FHIR and draft precepts; check back next week.
- FMG update -
- Methodology update-
- Review precepts, associated governance points and risks
- HL7/IHE/DICOM coordination (John)
- Next steps: Define and Resource other Governance processes.
- Education
- Need a work plan that is coordinated with HL7 Education Director
- Conformity Assessment
- Appeal Process / Escalation
- What is the appeal process for resources not chosen for inclusion in the ballot?
- What is the appeal / escalation process for Management decisions?
- What is the appeal / escalation process for Governance decisions? Responsibilities for resources (education, conformity process, appeal process)
- Education
Minutes
Convened at 5:07 PM
- Roll call - quorum not achieved
- Review changes identified in last week's discussion and incorporate Grahame's suggestions into the HL7 FHIR Risk Assessment
- Need to review existing open source community strategies for forking - ACTION ITEM: need to assign this review to someone
- Review document for completeness on next call and transform to TSC Risk Assessment template and iterate the evaluation using those criteria
- adjourned 6:01 PM
Next Steps
Actions (Include Owner, Action Item, and due date)
| |||
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
Back to FHIR_Governance_Board
© 2013 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.
