This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "November 6, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
#''(05 min)'' '''Roll Call, Approve [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=October_30,_2012_Security_Working_Group_Conference_Call October 30, 2012  Security Working Group Conference Call Minutes]  & Accept Agenda'''
 
#''(05 min)'' '''Roll Call, Approve [http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=October_30,_2012_Security_Working_Group_Conference_Call October 30, 2012  Security Working Group Conference Call Minutes]  & Accept Agenda'''
 
#''(20 min)'' '''HCS Ballot Prep Update''':  Prospective Normative Security Labeling Scheme, Conformance Criteria, and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7049/9824/SecurityLabelingServicev4JMD.pptx  Security Labeling System revision] – Mike Davis
 
#''(20 min)'' '''HCS Ballot Prep Update''':  Prospective Normative Security Labeling Scheme, Conformance Criteria, and [http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/7049/9824/SecurityLabelingServicev4JMD.pptx  Security Labeling System revision] – Mike Davis
#''(10 min)'' '''Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Update''' – John Carter
+
#''(10 min)'' '''S&P Ontology Ballot NIB due 10/28''' – John Carter
#''(20 min)'' '''Integrity Metadata''' – Group discussion
+
#''(20 min)'' '''Intergrity Metadata'''- Reed Gelzer and John Moehrke
 
#''(05 min)'' '''Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up
 
#''(05 min)'' '''Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up
 +
 
==Minutes==
 
==Minutes==
 
*RE:  Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, Mike Davis…, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda. - It was decided that the minutes would not be approved because the Oct. 30 meeting was an informal meeting that the CoChairs did not attend.  
 
*RE:  Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, Mike Davis…, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda. - It was decided that the minutes would not be approved because the Oct. 30 meeting was an informal meeting that the CoChairs did not attend.  
*RE:  '''HCS Ballot Prep Update'''- 2 announcements have been made: One is for the health classification system release 1. The second the second one is for the oncology normative release ballot. The piece that is being driven is the definition of the fields that are specific to the health care domain that we’re hoping to move toward normative status. This is a trimmed down version of what was balloted before. The fields are normative. There is a table in the document that describes the fields. Just the fields and not the terminology that goes into the fields. Conformance Possibilities: The first possibilities is with NIST fixed pub 188 it has a classification theme and is modeled after some HTS requirements as well that could be used. Conformance is not required until we’re getting ready for normative. Kathleen has a list of the labels and will send those out to the group. 10181-3 has a lot of information about labels and ISO 2382 is another one that has a lot of information about labels. Kathleen will send this information out to the group by the end of the day.  
+
*RE:  '''HCS Ballot Prep Update'''- 2 announcements have been made: One is for the health classification system release 1. The second one is for the oncology normative release ballot. The piece that is being driven is the definition of the fields that are specific to the health care domain that we’re hoping to move toward normative status. This is a trimmed down version of what was balloted before. The fields are normative. There is a table in the document that describes the fields. Just the fields and not the terminology that goes into the fields. Conformance Possibilities: The first possibilities is with NIST fixed pub 188 it has a classification theme and is modeled after some HTS requirements as well that could be used. Conformance is not required until we’re getting ready for normative. Kathleen has a list of the labels and will send those out to the group. 10181-3 has a lot of information about labels and ISO 2382 is another one that has a lot of information about labels. Kathleen will send this information out to the group by the end of the day.  
*RE:  '''Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Update''' - John is still getting up to speed. The oncology release has been submitted as a first normative ballot. John needs the link to the comments. If they want to submit a reconciliation, you must do so by 11/18.
+
*RE:  '''Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Update''' - John is still getting up to speed. The oncology release has been submitted as a first normative ballot. John needs the link to the comments spreadsheet. Kathleen will send the spreadsheet out to the group by the end of the day. If they want to submit a reconciliation, you must do so by 11/18.
*RE: '''DS4P''' -   
+
*RE:  '''Integrity Metadata''' - Due to the high level of interest in records management, we’re framing the discussion around figuring out the vocabulary. We are working to understand the bridges between details and the functional support for records management and how that is conceptualized. We did make some preliminary suggestions and particular points that we think will be of interest in drilling down a bit and sent those over to Mike.
*RE:  '''Integrity Metadata''' -  
 
 
*RE:  Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up
 
*RE:  Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up
 
Meeting adjourned at 6:05 PM Eastern
 
Meeting adjourned at 6:05 PM Eastern
Line 40: Line 40:
 
==Action Items==
 
==Action Items==
 
*RE:Kathleen will have the vocabulary annotated and out by the end of the day today.  
 
*RE:Kathleen will have the vocabulary annotated and out by the end of the day today.  
*RE:Kathleen is going to get the link to the comments over to John – comments and reconciliation.
+
*RE:Kathleen is going to get the link to the comments spreadsheet to the group – comments and reconciliation for ontology. '''[http://gforge.hl7.org/gf/download/docmanfileversion/6684/9160/AmalgamatedMay2011BallotCommentsonSecurityandPrivacyOntology.xlsx]'''
 
*RE:Kathleen to check on the process for submitting reconciliation for ontology – Do we need to reconcile it for the second round of informative ballot?
 
*RE:Kathleen to check on the process for submitting reconciliation for ontology – Do we need to reconcile it for the second round of informative ballot?
 
*RE:Mike would like to set up a meeting with John to go through it in detail to resolve any comments if any.
 
*RE:Mike would like to set up a meeting with John to go through it in detail to resolve any comments if any.

Latest revision as of 04:10, 9 November 2012

Security Working Group Meeting

Meeting Information Back to Security Main Page

Attendees

Back to Security Main Page

Agenda

  1. (05 min) Roll Call, Approve October 30, 2012 Security Working Group Conference Call Minutes & Accept Agenda
  2. (20 min) HCS Ballot Prep Update: Prospective Normative Security Labeling Scheme, Conformance Criteria, and Security Labeling System revision – Mike Davis
  3. (10 min) S&P Ontology Ballot NIB due 10/28 – John Carter
  4. (20 min) Intergrity Metadata- Reed Gelzer and John Moehrke
  5. (05 min) Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up

Minutes

  • RE: Approval of Minutes and Agenda – Presiding Cochair, Mike Davis…, asked for approval of the minutes and agenda. - It was decided that the minutes would not be approved because the Oct. 30 meeting was an informal meeting that the CoChairs did not attend.
  • RE: HCS Ballot Prep Update- 2 announcements have been made: One is for the health classification system release 1. The second one is for the oncology normative release ballot. The piece that is being driven is the definition of the fields that are specific to the health care domain that we’re hoping to move toward normative status. This is a trimmed down version of what was balloted before. The fields are normative. There is a table in the document that describes the fields. Just the fields and not the terminology that goes into the fields. Conformance Possibilities: The first possibilities is with NIST fixed pub 188 it has a classification theme and is modeled after some HTS requirements as well that could be used. Conformance is not required until we’re getting ready for normative. Kathleen has a list of the labels and will send those out to the group. 10181-3 has a lot of information about labels and ISO 2382 is another one that has a lot of information about labels. Kathleen will send this information out to the group by the end of the day.
  • RE: Security and Privacy Ontology Ballot Update - John is still getting up to speed. The oncology release has been submitted as a first normative ballot. John needs the link to the comments spreadsheet. Kathleen will send the spreadsheet out to the group by the end of the day. If they want to submit a reconciliation, you must do so by 11/18.
  • RE: Integrity Metadata - Due to the high level of interest in records management, we’re framing the discussion around figuring out the vocabulary. We are working to understand the bridges between details and the functional support for records management and how that is conceptualized. We did make some preliminary suggestions and particular points that we think will be of interest in drilling down a bit and sent those over to Mike.
  • RE: Other Business, Agenda for Next call, Action Items, and Wrap Up

Meeting adjourned at 6:05 PM Eastern

Action Items

  • RE:Kathleen will have the vocabulary annotated and out by the end of the day today.
  • RE:Kathleen is going to get the link to the comments spreadsheet to the group – comments and reconciliation for ontology. [1]
  • RE:Kathleen to check on the process for submitting reconciliation for ontology – Do we need to reconcile it for the second round of informative ballot?
  • RE:Mike would like to set up a meeting with John to go through it in detail to resolve any comments if any.

Reference Material from Call

  • Diagram of the components of a healthcare security labeling system