This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "OO CR049-676 Order Status Update Message"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
Hbuitendijk (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Accepted Change Requests}} |
| − | {{OO | + | {{OO Accepted V2.8 Change Requests}} |
Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | Return to [[:Category:OO Change Requests|OO Change Requests]] page. | ||
Latest revision as of 17:40, 24 February 2011
Return to OO Change Requests page.
| Submitted by: Hans Buitendijk | Revision date: <<Date>> |
| Submitted date: December 15, 2010 | Change request ID: OO CR049 |
| Standard/IG: 2.8 Standard | Artifact ID, Name: <<Artifact ID, Name>> |
Contents
Issue
See 2.8 change request File:OO CR049-676.doc for problem definition and proposal.
Recommendation
Rationale
Discussion
- 12-Jan-2011
- Suggestion to add OBR as optional. Concern that this would conflict with other detail segments.
- Motion to accept as proposed with addition of text to clarify that not all control codes apply. Andrzej Knafel, Patrick Loyd
- Against: 0, Abstain: 0; In Favor: 7
