This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Requirements-CMETs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | | ''OMG Mapping'' | ||
+ | | {{OMG-MIF-In UML}} Inheritance and aggregation | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 32: | Line 34: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | | ''OMG Mapping'' | ||
+ | | {{OMG-MIF-In UML}} Inheritance and aggregation | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 49: | Line 53: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | | ''OMG Mapping'' | ||
+ | | {{OMG-MIF-In UML}} Inheritance and aggregation | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 66: | Line 72: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | | ''OMG Mapping'' | ||
+ | | {{OMG-MIF-HL7 Profile}} Add stereotype and place CMETs into a package | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 83: | Line 91: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | | ''OMG Mapping'' | ||
+ | | {{OMG-MIF-Not Supported}} This appears to be a Methodology issue not modeling | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 100: | Line 110: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | ''OMG Mapping'' | ||
+ | | {{OMG-MIF-Not Supported}} Translations to other languages will require specific tool support | ||
+ | |||
|} | |} | ||
Line 117: | Line 131: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | ''OMG Mapping'' | ||
+ | | {{OMG-MIF-HL7 Profile}} Add stereotype and place CMETs into a package | ||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:34, 11 August 2010
Requirement | Model fragments that can be used by other model fragments (static models) are required. Expresses a common, useful, reuseable concepts expressed small model pieces (chunks) | |
Rationale | Promotes Re-use by modelers; Common model enables domain knowledge to be used. Uniformly represents a concept for use by all interested committees | |
"Methodology" | HDF methodology, metadata | |
MIF | ||
OMG Mapping | Inheritance and aggregation |
Requirement | Message type fragment that can be used by other message type fragments (static models). Expresses a common, useful, reuseable concepts expressed small model pieces (chunks) | |
Rationale | Promotes Re-use by modelers; Common model enables domain knowledge to be used. Uniformly represents a concept for use by all interested committees | |
"Methodology" | HDF methodology, metadata | |
MIF | ||
OMG Mapping | Inheritance and aggregation |
Requirement | May be referenced by both producing and other committees | |
Rationale | Promotes Re-use by modelers; Common model enables domain knowledge to be used. Uniformly represents a concept for use by all interested committees | |
"Methodology" | HDF methodology, metadata | |
MIF | ||
OMG Mapping | Inheritance and aggregation |
Requirement | A registry of CMETs should be accessible by static model designers | |
Rationale | Promotes Re-use by providing a list of available CMETs to use, from a common library. | |
"Methodology" | Metadata. Is an interface specification that is bound to a static mode | |
MIF | ||
OMG Mapping | Add stereotype and place CMETs into a package |
Requirement | Provides robust binding to models both statically and dynamically (design or runtime). This must provide both early and late binding to model, including late binding to default/most recent model. Ability to choose between multiple class types in final message type is deferred until runtime | |
Rationale | Provides encapsulation, some degree of polymorphism, model independence. | |
"Methodology" | Metadata. | |
MIF | ||
OMG Mapping | This appears to be a Methodology issue not modeling |
Requirement | Ability of content of chunks to change without update/affecting referencing model. supports localization. provides abstractions. Allows model to be built with abstractions (literally). | |
Rationale | Users need to be able to develop sections of models that conform to local and realm-specific uses and regulations. Larger domain models can be constructed independently. Design of model components isolated - encapsulation | |
"Methodology" | metadata, use of interfaces and stubs. | |
MIF | ||
OMG Mapping | Translations to other languages will require specific tool support |
Requirement | Is available in local scope. Is available to multiple NE releases and models. | |
Rationale | Users need to be able to choose from available off-the-shelf components | |
"Methodology" | Interface file: realm-name-id, Binding by name, not identity. interface files that relate model to release, Indirection resolved by publishing process | |
MIF | ||
OMG Mapping | Add stereotype and place CMETs into a package |
Requirement | Derived from a single DMIM. Content is direct subset of class clones and attributes defined in that DMIM - does not span DMIMs | |
Rationale | Has model derivation using identical process to any static model. Keeps both users and modelers happy. | |
"Methodology" | HDF, metadata | |
MIF |
Requirement | Has Semantic categories: attribution (level of property constraint), generalization (subsumption). Are derived by iterative refinement of a domain model | |
Rationale | Has model derivation using identical process to any static model. Keeps both users and modelers happy. | |
"Methodology" | metadata | |
MIF |
Properties
Requirement | Always at least one variant (univeral) | |
Rationale | Equivalent to an unconstrained RMIM | |
"Methodology" | metadata | |
MIF |
Requirement | Should be used to carry reference information only | |
Rationale | Guidelines for use | |
"Methodology" | publications | |
MIF |
Requirement | Model fragments that can be used by other model fragments (static models) are required. Expresses a common, useful, reuseable concepts expressed small model pieces (chunks) | |
Rationale | Promotes Re-use by modelers; Common model enables domain knowledge to be used. Uniformly represents a concept for use by all interested committees | |
"Methodology" | HDF methodology, metadata | |
MIF |
Requirement | Message type fragment that can be used by other message type fragments (static models). Expresses a common, useful, reuseable concepts expressed small model pieces (chunks) | |
Rationale | Promotes Re-use by modelers; Common model enables domain knowledge to be used. Uniformly represents a concept for use by all interested committees | |
"Methodology" | HDF methodology, metadata | |
MIF |
Requirement | May be referenced by both producing and other committees | |
Rationale | Promotes Re-use by modelers; Common model enables domain knowledge to be used. Uniformly represents a concept for use by all interested committees | |
"Methodology" | HDF methodology, metadata | |
MIF |
Requirement | A registry of CMETs should be accessible by static model designers | |
Rationale | Promotes Re-use by providing a list of available CMETs to use, from a common library. | |
"Methodology" | Metadata. Is an interface specification that is bound to a static mode | |
MIF |
Requirement | Provides robust binding to models both statically and dynamically (design or runtime). This must provide both early and late binding to model, including late binding to default/most recent model. Ability to choose between multiple class types in final message type is deferred until runtime | |
Rationale | Provides encapsulation, some degree of polymorphism, model independence. | |
"Methodology" | Metadata. | |
MIF |
Requirement | Ability of content of chunks to change without update/affecting referencing model. supports localization. provides abstractions. Allows model to be built with abstractions (literally). | |
Rationale | Users need to be able to develop sections of models that conform to local and realm-specific uses and regulations. Larger domain models can be constructed independently. Design of model components isolated - encapsulation | |
"Methodology" | metadata, use of interfaces and stubs. | |
MIF |
Requirement | Is available in local scope. Is available to multiple NE releases and models. | |
Rationale | Users need to be able to choose from available off-the-shelf components | |
"Methodology" | Interface file: realm-name-id, Binding by name, not identity. interface files that relate model to release, Indirection resolved by publishing process | |
MIF |
Requirement | Derived from a single DMIM. Content is direct subset of class clones and attributes defined in that DMIM - does not span DMIMs | |
Rationale | Has model derivation using identical process to any static model. Keeps both users and modelers happy. | |
"Methodology" | HDF, metadata | |
MIF |
Requirement | Has Semantic categories: attribution (level of property constraint), generalization (subsumption). Are derived by iterative refinement of a domain model | |
Rationale | Has model derivation using identical process to any static model. Keeps both users and modelers happy. | |
"Methodology" | metadata | |
MIF |
Requirement | Should be used to identify the focal class that is the target of a trigger event. | |
Rationale | Guidelines for use | |
"Methodology" | publications | |
MIF |
Requirement | Should not carry update values. | |
Rationale | Guidelines for use | |
"Methodology" | publications | |
MIF |
Requirement | Should not be used to simplify a diagram/model | |
Rationale | Guidelines for use | |
"Methodology" | publications | |
MIF |
Requirement | Cannot be individually constrained. | |
Rationale | Guidelines for use | |
"Methodology" | publications | |
"Note" | This is a deficiency. |
Requirement | Behaves as a macro substitution.. | |
Rationale | Guidelines for use | |
"Methodology" | metadata, publications | |
"MIF" |