Difference between revisions of "ICTC concall 20090611"
Frankoemig (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*Jane Gilbert | *Jane Gilbert | ||
*Frank Oemig | *Frank Oemig | ||
− | * | + | *Vince McCauley |
no quorum! | no quorum! |
Latest revision as of 08:02, 18 June 2009
Thursday 4:30 PM (US Eastern Time, GMT -5)
Please consult http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock for your local times Phone Number: 770-657-9270 (??) Participant Passcode: 644843 (??)
Return to IC concalls 2009
Contents
Participants
- Jane Gilbert
- Frank Oemig
- Vince McCauley
no quorum!
Agenda
Proposal 605
The new version of 605 looks much better. It includes the result from the discussion in Kyoto. In principle it reflects a general approach, which is also useful/reasonable/applicable for V3 and other HL7 standards. The contents should be added to chapter 2B. For a preparation we have to send it to other WGs lilke InM, MnM and ITS.
We also have to separate between the general concepts explaining conformance, compliance and compatibility esp. with the reference to ECCF and the documentation hierarchy. Furthermore, we should highlight the benefits from this proposal. This raised the question how to deal with generic/independant concepts like this? We probably have to discuss with Karen v.H.
Maintainance: The original proposal can be found in the proposal database. An update is not possible. Adding a new proposal with each new version of the paper seems to be inappropriate. Therefore, it will be sent to the list and uploaded to the HL7 document server. The document can be found here: [[1]]
We will create a wiki page reflecting the discussion and references to the document.
IHE (internal) terminology whitepaper
see IHE website; Update has been sent in advance to the call.
ECCF
Left for the next call. Please examine with regard to 605.