This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "SPL Graphics Specification"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(issue under discussion beginning Aug 2008) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | [[Category:RCRIM]] | |
== Graphic Specifications for Labeling == | == Graphic Specifications for Labeling == | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''Proposal:''' | '''Proposal:''' | ||
Restrict images associated with SPL to 96 DPI to ensure uniform and predictable rendering in downstream uses of SPL. | Restrict images associated with SPL to 96 DPI to ensure uniform and predictable rendering in downstream uses of SPL. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Countered with''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | requirements: min/max size & clarity; under screen and print conditions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
'''Background from FDA:''' | '''Background from FDA:''' | ||
| Line 12: | Line 18: | ||
Test procedure … print test docs on regular (good quality) office paper. Print is finally what its about. 96 dpi line graphics OK ½ to 2/3 paper width. Greyscale; colour | Test procedure … print test docs on regular (good quality) office paper. Print is finally what its about. 96 dpi line graphics OK ½ to 2/3 paper width. Greyscale; colour | ||
| − | |||
'''Discussion Points''' | '''Discussion Points''' | ||
Latest revision as of 16:27, 10 November 2009
Graphic Specifications for Labeling
Proposal: Restrict images associated with SPL to 96 DPI to ensure uniform and predictable rendering in downstream uses of SPL.
Countered with
requirements: min/max size & clarity; under screen and print conditions.
Background from FDA:
- small size internal / NLM pdfs
- in 2005 received bad images (size).
- Most current users have learned; however, new user groups will experience same problems.
Test procedure … print test docs on regular (good quality) office paper. Print is finally what its about. 96 dpi line graphics OK ½ to 2/3 paper width. Greyscale; colour
Discussion Points
Technical arguments as to why DPI is not the sole, or even the most important, factor in achieving the stated objective.
What we want is dpi and size – its really size that matters.
?? Proposal for better control parameters (image size) in schema
