Difference between revisions of "Device (QDM)"
Bryn rhodes (talk | contribs) |
Bryn rhodes (talk | contribs) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
| row1cell1 | Device Order | | row1cell1 | Device Order | ||
| row1cell2 | DeviceRequest.intent | | row1cell2 | DeviceRequest.intent | ||
− | | row1cell3 | | + | | row1cell3 | DeviceRequest.intent uses the concepts draft, active, on-hold, revoked, completed, entered-in-error, unkown. "Draft" is most consistent with the DeviceRequest when applied to clinical decision support (CDS) or expectations a provider gives to a patient. "active" or "completed" is consistent with the intent of the QDM Device, Order datatype. |
|- | |- | ||
| row2cell1 | Negation Rationale | | row2cell1 | Negation Rationale | ||
| row2cell2 | None | | row2cell2 | None | ||
− | | row2cell3 | DeviceRequest resource does not include a reason the device request did not occur. QI Core does have a ProcedureRequest.extension (http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/procedurerequest-reasonRefused). | + | | row2cell3 | DeviceRequest resource does not include a reason the device request did not occur. QI Core does have a ProcedureRequest.extension (http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/procedurerequest-reasonRefused). One could address negation rationale by indicating DeviceRequest.status constrained to values suspended or cancelled and reference DeviceRequest.reasonCode to indicate the reason (i.e., reason for not using the device). |
|- | |- | ||
| row2cell1 | Reason | | row2cell1 | Reason | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
| row2cell1 | Author dateTime | | row2cell1 | Author dateTime | ||
| row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.AuthoredOn | | row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.AuthoredOn | ||
− | | row2cell3 | Note - | + | | row2cell3 | Note - DeviceRequest.occurrence[x] defines a dateTime when the event should occur - not addressed in QDM<br> |
+ | Note: FHIR Provenance generally addresses the author of the message; the identifier/source of the original resource element is defined by the resource. Individual resource element provenance is summarized in the FHIR W5 Report (http://hl7.org/fhir/w5.html). | ||
|- | |- | ||
| row2cell1 | Code | | row2cell1 | Code | ||
| row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.code | | row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.code | ||
− | | row2cell3 | | + | | row2cell3 | Device requested |
|- | |- | ||
| row2cell1 | id | | row2cell1 | id | ||
Line 88: | Line 89: | ||
| row2cell1 | Source | | row2cell1 | Source | ||
| row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.requester | | row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.requester | ||
− | | row2cell3 | | + | | row2cell3 | Who, what is requesting the diagnositics - note also, DeviceRequest.performer to indicate the requested filler of the request. |
|} | |} | ||
Line 100: | Line 101: | ||
| row1cell1 | Device Recommended | | row1cell1 | Device Recommended | ||
| row1cell2 | DeviceRequest.intent | | row1cell2 | DeviceRequest.intent | ||
− | | row1cell3 | | + | | row1cell3 | DeviceRequest.intent uses the concepts draft, active, on-hold, revoked, copmleted, enetered-in-error, unknown. "draft" is most consistent with the DeviceRequest when applied to clinical decision support (CDS) or expectations a provider gives to a patient. "active" or "completed" is consistent with the intent of the QDM Device, Order datatype. |
|- | |- | ||
| row2cell1 | Negation Rationale | | row2cell1 | Negation Rationale | ||
Line 112: | Line 113: | ||
| row2cell1 | Author dateTime | | row2cell1 | Author dateTime | ||
| row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.AuthoredOn | | row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.AuthoredOn | ||
− | | row2cell3 | Note - | + | | row2cell3 | Note - DeviceRequest.occurrence[x] defines a dateTime when the event should occur - not addressed in QDM<br> |
+ | Note: FHIR Provenance generally addresses the author of the message; the identifier/source of the original resource element is defined by the resource. Individual resource element provenance is summarized in the FHIR W5 Report (http://hl7.org/fhir/w5.html). | ||
|- | |- | ||
| row2cell1 | Code | | row2cell1 | Code | ||
| row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.code | | row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.code | ||
− | | row2cell3 | | + | | row2cell3 | Device requested |
|- | |- | ||
| row2cell1 | id | | row2cell1 | id | ||
Line 124: | Line 126: | ||
| row2cell1 | Source | | row2cell1 | Source | ||
| row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.requester | | row2cell2 | DeviceRequest.requester | ||
− | | row2cell3 | | + | | row2cell3 | Who, what is requesting the diagnositics - note also, DeviceRequest.performer to indicate the requested filler of the request. |
|} | |} |
Latest revision as of 04:03, 28 November 2018
Back to Harmonization of Health Quality Information Models Page
This QDM to QI Core Mapping for the QDM Datatype "Device" was reviewed by the CQI WG on April 6, 2018 for QDM version 5.3. The content presented here is based on QDM version 5.4 and removes the QDM 5.3 attribute "anatomical approach site" as there was no existing use or clear use case to retain it.
QDM defines Device as an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in-vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including a component part or accessory, intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease and not dependent on being metabolized to achieve any of its primary intended purposes. QDM provides three contexts for expressing devices: Device, Applied; Device, Order; and Device, Recommended.
- Note that the current use of the QDM datatype “Device, Applied” usually references the procedure to “apply” the device (i.e., to use for the patient, to use on the patient’s body, or to implant in the patient’s body). Each of these current uses should address the concept using the QDM datatypes, Intervention, Performed, or Procedure, Performed.
- The original intent of the QDM datatype “Device, Applied” was to reference the specific device or type of device of concern to the measure. And that reference might be as detailed a providing a device class as referenced in a Unique Device Identifier (UDI). The FHIR Device resource (http://hl7.org/fhir/device.html) does have a metadata element for UDI (http://hl7.org/fhir/device-definitions.html#Device.udi). All device metadata reference inherent qualities of the device. And timing addresses Device.manufactureDate and Device.expirationDate. Therefore, a direct map to the Device resource may not be sufficient or appropriate for the QDM Device, Applied datatype.
- The FHIR Resource DeviceUseStatement (http://hl7.org/fhir/deviceusestatement.html) is a more appropriate resource to map QDM Device, Applied. The DeviceUseStatement has a maturity level of 0, so the mapping will need to be updated as the resource is updated. Note: this mapping will need to be reviewed with the QI Core DeviceUseStatement to assure alignment since the current QI Core content does not seem to address the most recent version of DeviceUseStatement.
Device, Applied
QDM Attribute | QI Core Metadata Element | Comment |
Device Applied | DeviceUseStatement | A record of a device being used by a patient where the record is the result of a report from the patient or another clinician. |
Anatomical Location Site | DeviceUseStatement.bodySite | Indicates the site on the subject's body where the device was used ( i.e. the target site). |
Negation Rationale | None | A DeviceUseStatement does not address negation directly since there would be no statement if the device were absent. QDM usage is to indicate devices that have not been applied should address negation rationale for the order or the recommendation (i.e., ProcedureRequest.extension (reasonRefused)). One could address negation rationale by indicating DeviceUseStatement.status constrained to values stopped or on-hold and reference DeviceUseStatement.reason to indicate the reason (i.e., reason for not using the device). |
Reason | DeviceUseStatement.indication | Reason or justification for use of the device. |
Relevant Period | DeviceUseStatement.whenUsed | The time period over which the device was used.
Note – the DeviceUseStatement resource also has a metadata element: DeviceUseStatement.timing(x) indicating how often the device was used (may be a period or dateTime). |
Author dateTime | DeviceUseStatement.recordedOn | The time at which the DeviceUseStatement was made/recorded. |
Code | DeviceUseStatement.device Device.udi.deviceIdentifier |
DeviceUseStatemtn.device references Device for details of the device used. Device.udi.deviceIdentifier (DI) is a mandatory, fixed portion of a Unique Device Identified (UDI) that identifies the labeler and the specific version or model of a device. |
id | DeviceUseStatement.id | Logical id of this artifact |
Source | DeviceUseStatement.source | Who reported this device was being used by the patient. |
Device, Order
QDM Attribute | QI Core Metadata Element | Comment |
Device Order | DeviceRequest.intent | DeviceRequest.intent uses the concepts draft, active, on-hold, revoked, completed, entered-in-error, unkown. "Draft" is most consistent with the DeviceRequest when applied to clinical decision support (CDS) or expectations a provider gives to a patient. "active" or "completed" is consistent with the intent of the QDM Device, Order datatype. |
Negation Rationale | None | DeviceRequest resource does not include a reason the device request did not occur. QI Core does have a ProcedureRequest.extension (http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/procedurerequest-reasonRefused). One could address negation rationale by indicating DeviceRequest.status constrained to values suspended or cancelled and reference DeviceRequest.reasonCode to indicate the reason (i.e., reason for not using the device). |
Reason | DeviceRequest.reasonCode | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Author dateTime | DeviceRequest.AuthoredOn | Note - DeviceRequest.occurrence[x] defines a dateTime when the event should occur - not addressed in QDM Note: FHIR Provenance generally addresses the author of the message; the identifier/source of the original resource element is defined by the resource. Individual resource element provenance is summarized in the FHIR W5 Report (http://hl7.org/fhir/w5.html). |
Code | DeviceRequest.code | Device requested |
id | DeviceRequest.id | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Source | DeviceRequest.requester | Who, what is requesting the diagnositics - note also, DeviceRequest.performer to indicate the requested filler of the request. |
Device, Recommended
QDM Attribute | QI Core Metadata Element | Comment |
Device Recommended | DeviceRequest.intent | DeviceRequest.intent uses the concepts draft, active, on-hold, revoked, copmleted, enetered-in-error, unknown. "draft" is most consistent with the DeviceRequest when applied to clinical decision support (CDS) or expectations a provider gives to a patient. "active" or "completed" is consistent with the intent of the QDM Device, Order datatype. |
Negation Rationale | None | DeviceRequest resource does not include a reason the device request did not occur. QI Core does have a ProcedureRequest.extension (http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/procedurerequest-reasonRefused). See FHIR Tracker Item 15939. |
Reason | DeviceRequest.reasonCode | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Author dateTime | DeviceRequest.AuthoredOn | Note - DeviceRequest.occurrence[x] defines a dateTime when the event should occur - not addressed in QDM Note: FHIR Provenance generally addresses the author of the message; the identifier/source of the original resource element is defined by the resource. Individual resource element provenance is summarized in the FHIR W5 Report (http://hl7.org/fhir/w5.html). |
Code | DeviceRequest.code | Device requested |
id | DeviceRequest.id | QDM matched to QI Core / FHIR |
Source | DeviceRequest.requester | Who, what is requesting the diagnositics - note also, DeviceRequest.performer to indicate the requested filler of the request. |