This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 12 September 2018"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|- | |- | ||
<!-- ********add attendee information here *********--> | <!-- ********add attendee information here *********--> | ||
− | | | + | | y || Jay Lyle |
|colspan="2"| JP Systems | |colspan="2"| JP Systems | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Yanyan Hu |
|colspan="2"| Joint Commission | |colspan="2"| Joint Commission | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Senthil Nachimuthu |
|colspan="2"| 3M | |colspan="2"| 3M | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Ken Lord |
|colspan="2"| VA | |colspan="2"| VA | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Rob Hausam |
|colspan="2"| IMO | |colspan="2"| IMO | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
|colspan="2"| Allscripts | |colspan="2"| Allscripts | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || George Dixon |
|colspan="2"| Allscripts | |colspan="2"| Allscripts | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
'''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | '''Agenda Topics''' <br/> | ||
# WGM agenda | # WGM agenda | ||
− | # Impairment | + | # Confirming transformations with steward organizations |
+ | # Cognitive Impairment | ||
# Problem | # Problem | ||
+ | ## Cases | ||
+ | ### Refute a rule-out, suspected, or previously asserted condition | ||
+ | #### use verification status | ||
+ | ### Resolve a problem | ||
+ | #### use clinical status | ||
+ | ### Assert absence for protocol: not pregnant, no night sweats. | ||
+ | #### Use Observation, not condition. We don't find evidence of a need for specific negation of conditions. | ||
+ | ### Translate CDA asserting "diabetes" negated | ||
+ | #### How often does this happen? | ||
+ | #### Translation engine needs to specify assumptions, e.g., | ||
+ | ##### if it's a negated condition, it's not a condition; drop it, or | ||
+ | ##### only transmit negated conditions with histories that tell us whether to tag it as Resolved or Refuted, or | ||
+ | ##### transmit negated conditions as observations: code = condition; answer = absent | ||
+ | ## status matrix | ||
+ | [[Image:ConditionStatusMatrix.png|center|1200px]] | ||
===Minutes=== | ===Minutes=== | ||
Line 116: | Line 132: | ||
<!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | <!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | ||
− | # | + | # WGM |
+ | ## Get confirmation from SD, FHIR | ||
+ | ### Invite Sarah, Rick, Jean, Lisa | ||
+ | ## propose connectathon | ||
+ | # Cognitive Impairment | ||
+ | ## CDA Section deprecated: use mental status | ||
+ | ## Mental status is just like Problem: a code (classifier as cognitive status value) and value (finding) | ||
+ | ## Also CDA Framework for Questionnaire Assessments | ||
+ | ### Lays out design patterns for questions & assertions | ||
+ | # Question: does C-CDA problem pattern define "observation" templates in addition to the problems? | ||
+ | # Review of Problem cases in agenda, above | ||
+ | ## Agreement: 1-3 should cover it. | ||
+ | ## How to confirm #4 does not happen? | ||
+ | ### Get a bunch of documents and look. Not feasible. | ||
+ | ### Ask SD listserv, call. | ||
+ | ### Deprecated Problem Status can say Inactive, Resolved; not Refuted. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[Media: ProblemStatus.xlsx | Excel version of diagram]] | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== | ||
Line 152: | Line 185: | ||
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | |width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/> | ||
Agenda for 9/19: | Agenda for 9/19: | ||
− | * | + | * Review Condition Status Matrix |
|} | |} | ||
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved. | © 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved. |
Latest revision as of 21:19, 12 September 2018
Back to Negation Minutes
Minutes
Meeting Information
HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line |
Date: 2018-09-05 Time: 4:00-5:00 PM ET | ||
Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems | |
y | Yanyan Hu | Joint Commission | |
y | Senthil Nachimuthu | 3M | |
y | Ken Lord | VA | |
y | Rob Hausam | IMO | |
Ben Hamlin | NCQA | ||
Lisa Nelson | |||
Emma Jones | Allscripts | ||
y | George Dixon | Allscripts | |
Michelle Miller | Cerner | ||
Michael Padula | Cerner | ||
Stephen Chu | |||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- WGM agenda
- Confirming transformations with steward organizations
- Cognitive Impairment
- Problem
- Cases
- Refute a rule-out, suspected, or previously asserted condition
- use verification status
- Resolve a problem
- use clinical status
- Assert absence for protocol: not pregnant, no night sweats.
- Use Observation, not condition. We don't find evidence of a need for specific negation of conditions.
- Translate CDA asserting "diabetes" negated
- How often does this happen?
- Translation engine needs to specify assumptions, e.g.,
- if it's a negated condition, it's not a condition; drop it, or
- only transmit negated conditions with histories that tell us whether to tag it as Resolved or Refuted, or
- transmit negated conditions as observations: code = condition; answer = absent
- Refute a rule-out, suspected, or previously asserted condition
- status matrix
- Cases
Minutes
- WGM
- Get confirmation from SD, FHIR
- Invite Sarah, Rick, Jean, Lisa
- propose connectathon
- Get confirmation from SD, FHIR
- Cognitive Impairment
- CDA Section deprecated: use mental status
- Mental status is just like Problem: a code (classifier as cognitive status value) and value (finding)
- Also CDA Framework for Questionnaire Assessments
- Lays out design patterns for questions & assertions
- Question: does C-CDA problem pattern define "observation" templates in addition to the problems?
- Review of Problem cases in agenda, above
- Agreement: 1-3 should cover it.
- How to confirm #4 does not happen?
- Get a bunch of documents and look. Not feasible.
- Ask SD listserv, call.
- Deprecated Problem Status can say Inactive, Resolved; not Refuted.
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items Agenda for 9/19:
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.