This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 25 July 2018"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
<!-- ********  CHANGE chair and scribe ON NEXT LINES  *******************-->
 
<!-- ********  CHANGE chair and scribe ON NEXT LINES  *******************-->
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator'''
 
| width="10%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Facilitator'''
| width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|Jay Lyle
+
| width="35%" colspan="1" align="left"|Senthil Nachimuthu
 
| width="25%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)'''
 
| width="25%" colspan="1" align="right"|'''Note taker(s)'''
| width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|Jay Lyle
+
| width="30%" colspan="1" align="left"|Senthil Nachimuthu
 
|-
 
|-
 
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
 
| border="4" cellpadding="1" colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
Line 56: Line 56:
 
|colspan="2"| 3M
 
|colspan="2"| 3M
 
|-
 
|-
| || Ken Lord
+
| X || Ken Lord
|colspan="2"|  
+
|colspan="2"| VA
 
|-
 
|-
 
|  || Gay Dolin
 
|  || Gay Dolin
Line 68: Line 68:
 
|colspan="2"| Allscripts
 
|colspan="2"| Allscripts
 
|-
 
|-
| || Lisa Nelson
+
| X || Lisa Nelson
 
|colspan="2"|  
 
|colspan="2"|  
 
|-
 
|-
Line 77: Line 77:
 
|colspan="2"| Allscripts
 
|colspan="2"| Allscripts
 
|-
 
|-
| X || Ken Lord
+
| X || Michelle Miller
|colspan="2"| Allscripts
+
|colspan="2"| Cerner
 
|-
 
|-
 
| X || Michelle Miller
 
| X || Michelle Miller
 
|colspan="2"| Cerner
 
|colspan="2"| Cerner
 
|-
 
|-
 
+
| X || Mia Nievera
 +
|colspan="2"| Joint Commission
 +
|-
 
|colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
 
|colspan="4" style="background:#f0f0f0;"|
 
|-
 
|-
Line 137: Line 139:
 
<!-- **** Delete instructions  and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES  ******-->
 
<!-- **** Delete instructions  and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES  ******-->
  
# Schedule
+
# Negation - medication administration QRDA CDA presented by Yanyan Hu.
## Senthil to conduct meeting 7/25
+
## QRDA CDA template has negationInd = "true" when the medication was not administered.
## detailed plan for January: later
+
## The effectivetime (both start and end) are set to the documentation time of the reason for why medication was not administered. (i.e., documentation time, not effective time of, e.g., child in incubator)
## October:
+
                The intended administration time of the medication (which was eventually not administered) is not captured in the QRDA CDA.
### present progress at PC, Vocab, FHIR, SD
+
 
### coordinate with Ken's SOA negation PSS
+
2.            MedicationAdministration FHIR resource alignment:
# examples
+
                                .status = not-done
## National Healthcare Safety Network
+
                                .statusReason
### Several presence/absence questions in CDA. Condition, observation, procedure?
+
                                                - example binding to SNOMED CT
#### one answer: for these, it seems questionnaire may be the right way to go (also for registries, other reporting)
+
                                .effective[x].effectiveDateTime - the effective time when the drug was supposed to have been given (if status = not-done)
#### For other cases, we can assert procedure done or not done and result with value or no value + value missing reason = not done
+
                               
## If it were an observation, best pattern unclear. Guidance at http://build.fhir.org/observation.html section 10.1.4.4.3 at odds with TermInfo but otherwise not directive.
+
                In addition, MedicationRequest resource has the .dosageInstruction.timing element. For a specific dose, the time specified in MedicationRequest.dosageInstruction.timing is expected to (~approximately) agree with the effectiveTime in MedicationAdministration, regardless of whether the medication was administered.
 +
               
 +
3.           (C-CDA 2.1 also has a Planned Medication Activity template that we reviewed. The mood code describes whether this is an intent vs request, etc., and the effectiveTime indicates the intended time).
  
 
===Meeting Outcomes===
 
===Meeting Outcomes===
Line 181: Line 185:
  
 
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
 
|width="100%" |'''Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items'''<br/>
* Continue example discussion
+
Agenda for 8/1:
* New plan
+
* Review of family history generic, including ‘no history of x’: George Dixon.
*
+
 
 
|}
 
|}
  
 
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International.  All rights reserved.
 
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International.  All rights reserved.

Latest revision as of 20:07, 8 August 2018

Back to Negation Minutes

Minutes

Meeting Information

HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes

Location: PC call line

Date: 2018-07-25
Time: 4:00-5:00 PM ET
Facilitator Senthil Nachimuthu Note taker(s) Senthil Nachimuthu
Attendee Name Affiliation



Jay Lyle JP Systems
X Yanyan Hu Joint Commission
X Senthil Nachimuthu 3M
X Ken Lord VA
Gay Dolin IMO
Ben Hamlin NCQA
George Dixon Allscripts
X Lisa Nelson
Emma Jones Allscripts
X George Dixon Allscripts
X Michelle Miller Cerner
X Michelle Miller Cerner
X Mia Nievera Joint Commission

Agenda

Agenda Topics

  1. Review schedule draft
    1. ballot for January (detail outline after WGM)
    2. limited objectives for October:
  2. Review sample examples
    1. NHSN negated risk factor: Senthil
    2. immunization not given: Jay
    3. no functional impairment
    4. no section information?
    5. no known health concerns
    6. no implanted devices
    7. no medications
    8. no cognitive impairment
    9. no planned tests
    10. no known problems
    11. no diabetes
    12. not pregnant
  3. revise
    1. never smoking: Ken Lord
    2. family history generic, including no history of x: George
    3. medication not done, with reason (QRDA): Yanyan
  4. done
    1. no known allergies: Jay
    2. no allergy to peanuts: Jay

Minutes

  1. Negation - medication administration QRDA CDA presented by Yanyan Hu.
    1. QRDA CDA template has negationInd = "true" when the medication was not administered.
    2. The effectivetime (both start and end) are set to the documentation time of the reason for why medication was not administered. (i.e., documentation time, not effective time of, e.g., child in incubator)
               The intended administration time of the medication (which was eventually not administered) is not captured in the QRDA CDA.

2. MedicationAdministration FHIR resource alignment:

                               .status = not-done
                               .statusReason
                                               - example binding to SNOMED CT
                               .effective[x].effectiveDateTime - the effective time when the drug was supposed to have been given (if status = not-done)
                               
               In addition, MedicationRequest resource has the .dosageInstruction.timing element. For a specific dose, the time specified in MedicationRequest.dosageInstruction.timing is expected to (~approximately) agree with the effectiveTime in MedicationAdministration, regardless of whether the medication was administered.
               

3. (C-CDA 2.1 also has a Planned Medication Activity template that we reviewed. The mood code describes whether this is an intent vs request, etc., and the effectiveTime indicates the intended time).

Meeting Outcomes

Actions
  • stakeholders interested in completion, secure resources
  • review posted document draft, examples


Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items

Agenda for 8/1:

  • Review of family history generic, including ‘no history of x’: George Dixon.

© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.