This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "Negation Requirements Project Minutes 18 July 2018"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
|- | |- | ||
<!-- ********add attendee information here *********--> | <!-- ********add attendee information here *********--> | ||
− | | | + | | y || Jay Lyle |
|colspan="2"| JP Systems | |colspan="2"| JP Systems | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Yanyan Hu |
|colspan="2"| Joint Commission | |colspan="2"| Joint Commission | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Senthil Nachimuthu |
|colspan="2"| 3M | |colspan="2"| 3M | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Ken Lord |
|colspan="2"| | |colspan="2"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
|colspan="2"| NCQA | |colspan="2"| NCQA | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || George Dixon |
|colspan="2"| Allscripts | |colspan="2"| Allscripts | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | | y || Lisa Nelson |
|colspan="2"| | |colspan="2"| | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 97: | Line 97: | ||
# Review sample examples | # Review sample examples | ||
## NHSN negated risk factor: Senthil | ## NHSN negated risk factor: Senthil | ||
+ | ## immunization not given: Jay | ||
## no functional impairment | ## no functional impairment | ||
## no section information? | ## no section information? | ||
## no known health concerns | ## no known health concerns | ||
− | |||
## no implanted devices | ## no implanted devices | ||
## no medications | ## no medications | ||
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
<!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | <!-- **** Delete instructions and fill in minutes ON NEXT LINES ******--> | ||
− | # Schedule: | + | # Schedule |
+ | ## Senthil to conduct meeting 7/25 | ||
+ | ## detailed plan for January: later | ||
+ | ## October: | ||
+ | ### present progress at PC, Vocab, FHIR, SD | ||
+ | ### coordinate with Ken's SOA negation PSS | ||
# examples | # examples | ||
+ | ## National Healthcare Safety Network | ||
+ | ### Several presence/absence questions in CDA. Condition, observation, procedure? | ||
+ | #### one answer: for these, it seems questionnaire may be the right way to go (also for registries, other reporting) | ||
+ | #### For other cases, we can assert procedure done or not done and result with value or no value + value missing reason = not done | ||
+ | ## If it were an observation, best pattern unclear. Guidance at http://build.fhir.org/observation.html section 10.1.4.4.3 at odds with TermInfo but otherwise not directive. | ||
===Meeting Outcomes=== | ===Meeting Outcomes=== |
Latest revision as of 17:38, 19 July 2018
Back to Negation Minutes
Minutes
Meeting Information
HL7 PC-CIMI-POC Meeting Minutes Location: PC call line |
Date: 2018-07-18 Time: 4:00-5:00 PM ET | ||
Facilitator | Jay Lyle | Note taker(s) | Jay Lyle |
Attendee | Name | Affiliation
| |
y | Jay Lyle | JP Systems | |
y | Yanyan Hu | Joint Commission | |
y | Senthil Nachimuthu | 3M | |
y | Ken Lord | ||
Gay Dolin | IMO | ||
Ben Hamlin | NCQA | ||
y | George Dixon | Allscripts | |
y | Lisa Nelson | ||
Emma Jones | Allscripts | ||
Agenda
Agenda Topics
- Review schedule draft
- ballot for January (detail outline after WGM)
- limited objectives for October:
- Review sample examples
- NHSN negated risk factor: Senthil
- immunization not given: Jay
- no functional impairment
- no section information?
- no known health concerns
- no implanted devices
- no medications
- no cognitive impairment
- no planned tests
- no known problems
- no diabetes
- not pregnant
- revise
- never smoking: Ken Lord
- family history generic, including no history of x: George
- medication not done, with reason (QRDA): Yanyan
- done
- no known allergies: Jay
- no allergy to peanuts: Jay
Minutes
- Schedule
- Senthil to conduct meeting 7/25
- detailed plan for January: later
- October:
- present progress at PC, Vocab, FHIR, SD
- coordinate with Ken's SOA negation PSS
- examples
- National Healthcare Safety Network
- Several presence/absence questions in CDA. Condition, observation, procedure?
- one answer: for these, it seems questionnaire may be the right way to go (also for registries, other reporting)
- For other cases, we can assert procedure done or not done and result with value or no value + value missing reason = not done
- Several presence/absence questions in CDA. Condition, observation, procedure?
- If it were an observation, best pattern unclear. Guidance at http://build.fhir.org/observation.html section 10.1.4.4.3 at odds with TermInfo but otherwise not directive.
- National Healthcare Safety Network
Meeting Outcomes
Actions
|
Next Meeting/Preliminary Agenda Items
|
© 2012 Health Level Seven® International. All rights reserved.