This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
<meta name="googlebot" content="noindex">

Difference between revisions of "V3 Prefaces at Topic Level"

From HL7Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
It is certainly something that we should entertain discussion on during our conference calls - I will put it on the agenda for the call this week (11am EST on Wednesday).  It would be great if you could attend to explain the business need.
 
It is certainly something that we should entertain discussion on during our conference calls - I will put it on the agenda for the call this week (11am EST on Wednesday).  It would be great if you could attend to explain the business need.
 
*20070702: Telcon :This is a tooling issue.  Tony will ask to add to wish list for tooling.
 
*20070702: Telcon :This is a tooling issue.  Tony will ask to add to wish list for tooling.
 +
*20080114: WGM: Scott will ping tooling.  Then we will revisit, and decide how annoying to be to tooling.  We will close after tooling acknowledges.
 +
*20080414: Scott:  email sent to tooling co-chairs.
 +
 +
*20100120: Sandy will ping Scott, Tony will ping tooling/publishing.
 +
*20101005: Sandy will follow up with Publishing.*201110111 - Sandy reported that this is fixed according to Don Lloyd.,  Tony will test, and report back to the  work group.

Latest revision as of 23:12, 10 January 2011


This is a page of type Category:InM Open Action Items.

V3 Prefaces at Topic Level

Opened  20051114
Assigned to: Tooling
Was action item ITEM: 1025

Prefaces at Topic Level, Pubs issue, need to take this up with Pubs. Results from MCCI R2 C1 ballot rec. item 134.

  • 20051114, Tony Julian, open
    • Propose to pubs to have preface at the topic level, instead of just having a preface at the domain level. If one has a varied range of Topics it makes no sense to have all preface comments at the domain level.
  • 20060113 Tony Julian, open, pubs
    • 20060113 WGM pubs will consider. Supported by pharmacy.
  • 20060508 WGM San Antonio, open
    • 20060508 WGM San Antonio: Ballot item in PFG ballot. Follow the resolution of that.
  • 20060911: WGM, INM: open. PFG = Pubs facilitators guide
  • 20070108: WGM: They'll look at it. Tony to talk to pubs about it this week.
  • 20070112: WGM: no update, Tony didnt get a chance to talk to them about this.
  • 20070122: Tony sent e-mail to Helen/Pubs list
  • 20070325: Tony Julian:

Email to editors: Helen et. al. Has there been any resolution to this? There was a note that this was a open item on the ballot of the Pubs facilitators guide.

  • 20070325: Tony Julian: Response from Helen Stevens: Julian,

No - this has not progressed - sorry, it must have got missed on our list. It is certainly something that we should entertain discussion on during our conference calls - I will put it on the agenda for the call this week (11am EST on Wednesday). It would be great if you could attend to explain the business need.

  • 20070702: Telcon :This is a tooling issue. Tony will ask to add to wish list for tooling.
  • 20080114: WGM: Scott will ping tooling. Then we will revisit, and decide how annoying to be to tooling. We will close after tooling acknowledges.
  • 20080414: Scott: email sent to tooling co-chairs.
  • 20100120: Sandy will ping Scott, Tony will ping tooling/publishing.
  • 20101005: Sandy will follow up with Publishing.*201110111 - Sandy reported that this is fixed according to Don Lloyd., Tony will test, and report back to the work group.