This wiki has undergone a migration to Confluence found Here
Difference between revisions of "MnM Minutes CC 20171128"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{subst::MnM Template for Agenda-Minutes}}") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | >[[Category:2017 MnM Minutes]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
=M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)= | =M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)= | ||
| − | |||
[[:Category:2017 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | [[:Category:2017 MnM Minutes|Return to MnM Minutes]] | ||
==Agenda== | ==Agenda== | ||
| − | + | Review Core Principles ballot reconciliation package | |
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
| − | * | + | * Lloyd McKenzie (chair/scribe) |
| − | * | + | * Austin Kriesler |
| + | * Jean Duteau | ||
| + | * Jeffrey Danford | ||
| + | * Louis Bedor | ||
| − | == | + | ==Core Principles ballot Reconciliation Package== |
| − | + | *Jean provided a brief history of the Core Principles spec and explained the current situation | |
| + | *Need to post a reconciliation package for the previous ballot before we can move onto the next ballot | ||
| + | *Most ballot comments were affirmative typos which are persuasive | ||
| + | *Lisa Nelson had 4 negatives. For expediency, proposal is to find them not releated and deal with them next round | ||
| + | *Lloyd suggest that "not persuasive" is more apt than "not related" as not all of the comments are out of scope - we're just not finding them persuasive to drive change before the next ballot. | ||
| + | *Motion to approve the reconciliation spreadsheet after changing "not related" to "not persuasive": Jean Duteau & Austin Kriesler 4-0-0 | ||
==Adjournment== | ==Adjournment== | ||
| + | 4:17 Eastern | ||
Latest revision as of 04:44, 29 November 2017
>
M&M Conference Call 4:00PM Eastern Time (Date above)
Agenda
Review Core Principles ballot reconciliation package
Attendees
- Lloyd McKenzie (chair/scribe)
- Austin Kriesler
- Jean Duteau
- Jeffrey Danford
- Louis Bedor
Core Principles ballot Reconciliation Package
- Jean provided a brief history of the Core Principles spec and explained the current situation
- Need to post a reconciliation package for the previous ballot before we can move onto the next ballot
- Most ballot comments were affirmative typos which are persuasive
- Lisa Nelson had 4 negatives. For expediency, proposal is to find them not releated and deal with them next round
- Lloyd suggest that "not persuasive" is more apt than "not related" as not all of the comments are out of scope - we're just not finding them persuasive to drive change before the next ballot.
- Motion to approve the reconciliation spreadsheet after changing "not related" to "not persuasive": Jean Duteau & Austin Kriesler 4-0-0
Adjournment
4:17 Eastern
